Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Approved 7/8/2013 <br />OC Board of Adjustment – 6/10/2013 Page 71 of 92 <br /> 1 <br />Ordinance <br />Requirements <br />PLANNING <br />STAFF <br />RECOMMENDED <br />FINDINGS <br />EVIDENCE SUBMITTED <br />TO SUPPORT <br />FINDINGS <br />BOA <br /> FINDINGS <br />Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (a) <br /> <br />Continued <br /> • Tab(s) 14, 16, 17, 18, <br />19, 20, 21, 22, 28, <br />and 30 of the <br />application booklet <br />contain evidence <br />demonstrating the <br />need for the tower, <br />provisions for <br />guaranteeing the <br />public’s safety and <br />general welfare. <br /> <br /> 2 <br />Larry Wright: Let’s move on to page 91. This is General Standards and we have the requirements in 3 <br />5.3.2 (A) (2) (a) and on page 92 this is continued and the findings continue onto tables 14, 16, 17, 18, 4 <br />19, 20, 21, 22, 28, and 30. Do I have a motion for this? 5 <br /> 6 <br />MOTION made by Mark Micol to find in favor of the finding that the use will maintain and promote the 7 <br />public health, safety and general welfare if located where proposed based on the testimony of 8 <br />Desiree Goldman representing the Greater Chapel Hill Association of Realtors and Aaron Nelson, 9 <br />President of the Chapel Hill Carrboro Chamber of Commerce that the additional tower will encourage 10 <br />the expansion of affordable high speed internet access in the County and provide equitable access to 11 <br />rural underserved areas. David Blankfard seconded. 12 <br />VOTE: Unanimous 13 <br /> 14 <br />15