BOA minutes 061013 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Approved 7/8/2013 OC Board of Adjustment – 6/10/2013 Page 15 of 92 project narrative, tab 39, Mr. Smith’s Impact Analysis, tab 6, the site plan indicating the project will 1 comply with the code and promote the public’s health safety and general welfare. You have tabs 14, 2 16 and now on page 92, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 30 are tabs having information 3 demonstrating the need for the tower and the development of the tower will be done with respect to 4 guarantee the public’s general health, safety and welfare. Page 93, complies with Section 5.3.2 (A) 5 (2) (b) which is the use will maintain or enhance the value of contiguous property. You have had 6 testimony this evening from Mr. Smith and the application packet specifically tabs 3, 39 and 6 provide 7 other documentation and information necessary to demonstrate compliance. On page 94, we have 8 requirements of Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (c) which is the location and character of the use if developed in 9 accordance to the plan submitted will be in harmony with the area in which is it to be located. As staff 10 indicates in our abstract several provisions of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan supporting the submittal 11 of telecommunication applications and the approval of telecommunication applications. We also 12 stipulate that tabs 3, 39 and 6 provide information demonstrating compliance with this standard. We 13 have heard no comments prior to this hearing indicating the project should not be approved so on 14 page 95 and 96, if the board does see fit to issue the permit, we recommend the imposition of 19 15 conditions which are spelled out herein. I will add, and the applicant can confirm, that they have 16 reviewed these conditions and have no issues with them being attached. 17 18 Larry Wright: Are there any questions for Mr. Harvey? 19 20 Karen Barrows: On page 85, 5.10.8 (B), Bond Security, is that in addition to the liability? 21 22 Michael Harvey: Yes, and on page 86, liability insurance they have to cover as well. If there are no 23 more questions, that concludes staff’s presentation. 24 25 Karen Kemerait: I want to confirm that we had reviewed the conditions. 26 27 Larry Wright: Any statement from the applicant? 28 29 Karen Kemerait: Nothing in addition to what I have already stated. 30 31 Larry Wright: We have gathered the evidence and now it’s time to close the hearing. Are there any 32 general comments from the Board right now? 33 34 Samantha Cabe: This is my first time here and I am not voting as an alternate but does the attorney 35 reiterate the charge of what we must do if we find this? 36 37 Larry Wright: It depends on the case and usually what we have is our charge is what we have to go 38 through and then we go through the findings and right now most of this case is in the findings so we 39 will move right to the findings. We don’t have to make any formal recommendations… on this 40 application we can move right to the findings. Let’s go through on page 39. 41 42 Debra Graham: Larry, you didn’t make a motion to close the public hearing. 43 44 MOTION made by Karen Barrows to close this portion of the public hearing. James Carter seconded. 45 VOTE: Unanimous 46 47 The public hearing portion of the meeting was closed at approximately 8:49 pm. 48 49 James Bryan: Can I ask a question for clarification? Who are the five voting members and do you 50 allow alternates in the deliberations. I reiterated before that it is gray but for deliberations there is a 51 little more weight not to have alternates. 52 53