Orange County NC Website
Approved 6/8/2015 <br /> <br />OC Board of Adjustment – 12/08/2014 Page 13 of 49 <br /> <br /> <br />Michael Harvey: I would say that is a correct statement, I would just point out for the record that the UDO as entered 1 <br />into the record at this proceeding, establishes no regulatory standards governing intensity, i.e. does not establish 2 <br />regulations governing number of shots to be fired in a given hour type of caliber limitations . It does not establish 3 <br />noise limits at property lines that can or cannot be exceeded and that was not the basis for us issuing the original 4 <br />Notice of Violation. 5 <br /> 6 <br />Mark Micol: Again, getting back to jurisdiction that means this board is not the recourse for the applicant, right? 7 <br />Basically, Mr. Chairman, what we are trying to figure out is jurisdiction? 8 <br /> 9 <br />Larry Wright: I think the jurisdiction… Mr. Bryan why don’t you clarify that because there are various points of 10 <br />jurisdiction. 11 <br /> 12 <br />James Bryan: You all aren’t proceeding exactly how I recommended but the jurisdiction is y ou have to find a 13 <br />determination. Michael didn’t order anything here, and a Notice of Violation is the first one. He made a determination 14 <br />but whatever y’all are doing, is a shooting range and then he thought about it and said, either I don’t have enough 15 <br />evidence for it or what I saw wasn’t a shooting range, for whatever reason he said rescind it, I wash my hands of it 16 <br />and that rescinding is now being appealed. You have somebody who has argued and is very eager to argue that it is 17 <br />final and binding and creates some sort of rights for Mr. Klein. I think Mr. Klein’s attorney is very eager to argue that 18 <br />no; it’s like when a cop writes you a ticket and tears up the ticket, he can still write you a new ticket. Just because he 19 <br />tore it up doesn’t mean that you weren’t speeding, it doesn’t do anything, just a wash. Y’all are going to have to 20 <br />make that determination. 21 <br /> 22 <br />Larry Wright: What we want is a definition of jurisdiction as it applies to this board because we feel jurisdiction is … it 23 <br />should go to somebody else. That is the way, when I read jurisdiction, I thought it should go to somebody else. It 24 <br />should go to the Board of County Commissioners. That is what you are alluding to. 25 <br /> 26 <br />James Bryan: No. I just think that …. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Mark Micol: We are just determining the NOV, right? 29 <br /> 30 <br />Larry Wright: That is it… 31 <br /> 32 <br />Mark Micol: It is a lot simpler than we are making it. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Larry Wright: As it applies to the UDO as of that April date. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Mark Micol: I have a feeling we are going to hear a lot of testimony about rapid fire …. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Larry Wright: Everyone can catch them on relevancy and repetition. Jurisdiction as it relates to…can you summarize 39 <br />that please. 40 <br /> 41 <br />James Bryan: A final and binding determination by staff and then you will affirm, reverse it or modify it but you have 42 <br />to find out what was the final and binding determination by staff. 43 <br /> 44 <br />Michael Harvey: Mr. Chairman, before we continue, I feel obligated to make a statement to this board. I already 45 <br />informed Mr. Morphis I was going to do this but I think before we continue I need to make a statement. Mr. Morphis 46 <br />and I have a 10 year association with each other that transcends this hearing date. We are friends; we have been 47 <br />friends for quite a while. It would be fair to say the he and I have had spirited discussions about this issue but we 48 <br />have not discussed the independent merits of this appeal obviously, that is between him, his client and this board. I 49 <br />think it is fair and you all need to know that Mr. Morphis and I have a relationship outside of this hearing and that 50