BOA minutes 101314 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Approved 12/8/2014 OC Board of Adjustment – 10/13/2014 Page 9 of 17 located in required buffers and there is nothing inconsistent with what TLC is proposing here that would invalidate the 1 finding. 2 3 T.C. Morphis: The driveway is pre-existing. 4 5 Larry Wright: I see it coming off Jones Ferry Road on this map and then I see a Mary Lee Perkins, her property, 6 does it abut that? 7 8 Walt Tysinger: Her property is here. 9 10 Larry Wright: She is aware of all this? 11 12 Walt Tysinger: We did notify her. 13 14 T.C. Morphis: When we did community meetings, we notified her. 15 16 Erin Witcher: It was 150 of the closest property owners. 17 18 Larry Wright: She is well aware this may be going on? 19 20 Michael Harvey: Mr. Chairman, on page 72 and 73, we have the certified mail receipts. Mrs. Perkins certified mail 21 receipt is on page 74. 22 23 T.C. Morphis: Two other requirements specific to camp retreat centers it says, recreational facilities are proposed, 24 the agreements must meet site improvement requirements of the ordinance. We are not proposing any private 25 recreational facilities. Off street parking shall be provided in accordance with Section 6.9 of the ordinance. 26 Essentially, the ordinance requires that we provide 29 spaces and if you include parking and our main parking area 27 here we have about 37 and we show on the map overflow parking but that is just a field that has been used in the 28 past for essentially a large fundraising activity but that is rarely used. There was a little confusion about impervious 29 surface; the entire tract is in the University Lake Watershed so it imposes a six percent impervious surface limit and if 30 you took the entire 230 acres, you are well below that number but because the special use permit only covers about 31 25 acres, we actually get a little closer. Six percent impervious limit on just the SUP area is 614 square feet, we 32 currently have a little over 54,000 square feet of impervious surface including parking area and existing structures. If 33 built out completely to the full phasing in 30 years, we would have a little over 75,000 square feet. We don’t have any 34 intention to do any construction that would violate the six percent impervious surface rule so we understand we would 35 have to come back and seek a modification of the SUP or take some other action which may involve expanding the 36 boundary of the property that is included within the SUP envelope. It would be fairly easy maneuver for TLC to 37 expand the boundary of its SUP out several acres and then that would lower that required impervious surface. 38 39 Michael Harvey: I will stipulate that the applicant has complied with all required elements of submitting this 40 application as broken down in Section 2.2 and 2.7 of the Unified Development Ordinance. We have provided you the 41 information beginning on page 76. 42 43 Karen Barrows: On page 33, Delores Chandler’s letter, second from the last paragraph, to acquire an improvement 44 permit more work would have to be completed. Are we concerned with an improvement? 45 46 Michael Harvey: No ma’am. The reason I would not be concerned is that on page 36, Exhibit 5B, we have a 47 memorandum from the Health Department where they have indicated they have no concerns but if there was ever a 48 need to expand the septic system, they would have to come back in. 49 50