BOA minutes 101314 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Approved 12/8/2014 OC Board of Adjustment – 10/13/2014 Page 13 of 17 MOTION made by David Blankfard to find in the affirmative along with staff’s recommendation for the requirements 1 listed on page 76. 2 Samantha Cabe seconded. To add clarification I would clarify that motion addresses the applicant’s compliance with 3 application components and notification requirements as set forth in the UDO sections. 4 VOTE: Unanimous 5 6 UDO Sec. 5.3.2(A)(2)(a): “The use will maintain or promote the public health, safety and general welfare, if located 7 where proposed and developed and operated according to the plan as submitted.” 8 9 UDO Sec. 5.3.2(A)(2)(b): “The use will maintain or enhance the value of contiguous property.” 10 11 UDO Sec. 5.3.2(A)(2)(c): “The location and character of the use, if developed according to the plan submitted, will be 12 in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and the use is in compliance with the plan for the physical 13 development of the county as embodied in these regulations, or in the Comprehensive Plan, or portion thereof, 14 adopted by the Board of County Commissioners.” 15 16 MOTION made by Samantha Cabe to find the applicant has met the general standards set forth in UDO Section 5.3.2 17 (a) (2) including subsections A, B and C and that pages 22 and 23 of our packet that was provided by the applicant in 18 addition to the staff abstract and Mr. Harvey’s testimony indicate that the use will maintain or promote the public 19 health, safety and general welfare as required by subsection (a). It will also maintain or enhance the value of 20 contiguous property as indicated in subsection (b) and the use will be in harmony with the area and complies with the 21 Comprehensive Plan as required by subsection (c). 22 David Blankfard seconded. 23 VOTE: Unanimous 24 25