Browse
Search
BOA minutes 082714
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Minutes
>
2014
>
BOA minutes 082714
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 9:16:22 AM
Creation date
3/7/2018 10:31:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/27/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
BOA agenda 082714
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Board of Adjustment\Agendas\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APPROVED 10/13/2014 <br />OC Board of Adjustment – 8/27/2014 Page 9 of 64 <br /> <br /> <br />Rob Priester: I believe that was a scoping letter. 1 <br />Matt Rhoads: North Carolina Department of Transportation. 2 <br />Rob Priester: That permit is pending. We have a separate permit for Alamance and Orange County. 3 <br />We have communication with NCDOT. As of now, we don’t foresee any issues with what has been 4 <br />submitted. 5 <br />Matt Rhoads: Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plans with Orange County. 6 <br />Rob Priester: Yes sir. Again, we have one in Alamance and Orange County we have multiple permits 7 <br />there. 8 <br />Matt Rhoads: And will any of the proposed facilities require sewage disposal or solid waste disposal or 9 <br />provisions of water? 10 <br />Rob Priester: No. 11 <br />Matt Rhoads: And you have submitted proof of insurance as required by Section 5.95? 12 <br />Rob Priester: Yes. We submitted that as part of the application. 13 <br />Matt Rhoads: Can you just talk a little bit about the purpose of the line. . Why PSNC is proposing this 14 <br />line. 15 <br />Rob Priester: We are proposing this pipeline to serve the public. We are proposing the project in order 16 <br />to serve the Chapel Hill/Duke/Durham and the surrounding areas of …. you have probably noticed 17 <br />additional pipeline projects along many of the roadways. The project will feed some of those distribution 18 <br />systems that are in the area. 19 <br />Matt Rhoads: And is the high demand due to growth in the area? 20 <br />Rob Priester: It is. 21 <br />Matt Rhoads: Environmental concerns, cleaner burning natural gas. 22 <br />Rob Priester: Natural gas is one of the cleanest burning fossil fuels so there is a demand based on that. 23 <br />Matt Rhoads: The relative low price of natural gas. Is that also driving demand? 24 <br />Rob Priester: Yes. 25 <br />Matt Rhoads: And if this project is not completed, will there be an adequate supply of natural gas in the 26 <br />area? 27 <br />Rob Priester: No. We need …. PSNC needs this pipeline to be able to serve its customers. 28 <br />Matt Rhoads: Will the pipeline serve the public convenience then? 29 <br />Rob Priester: Yes. 30 <br />Matt Rhoads: And the public necessity would be served by this pipeline? 31 <br />Rob Priester: Yes. We serve residential, commercial and industrial customers in this growing area. 32 <br />Matt Rhoads: If we inquire a little bit about the route of the pipeline, why did PSNC choose to run it 33 <br />parallel to the existing 10 inch line for most of the way, the 24 existing line? 34
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.