Browse
Search
BOA minutes 082714
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Minutes
>
2014
>
BOA minutes 082714
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 9:16:22 AM
Creation date
3/7/2018 10:31:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/27/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
BOA agenda 082714
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Board of Adjustment\Agendas\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APPROVED 10/13/2014 <br />OC Board of Adjustment – 8/27/2014 Page 24 of 64 <br /> <br /> <br /> 1 <br />Larry Wright: Yes go ahead. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Jeff Schmitt: Mr. Harvey, does the UDO talk about easements and what this Board can or cannot do in 4 <br />regards to granting easements or questioning easements? 5 <br /> 6 <br />Michael Harvey: Well, this Board, and I’m going to defer some of this to the county attorney, the issue of 7 <br />easements is not for this Board to necessarily address. We obviously have language in the Unified 8 <br />Development Ordinance dealing with easements as they relate to subdivision development, the creation 9 <br />of roads, the creation of necessary right-of-way but as far as the establishment of easements for this type 10 <br />of project, the ordinance does not require or establish any standards that is a private negotiation 11 <br />between the property owner and the in this case utility. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Mark Micol: Can I ask a general question, he talks about impervious surface, any easement in Orange 14 <br />County or let me ask you this, what leeway do the utilities have as far as the coverage of easements? 15 <br />Can they put gravel, can they put concrete, pavement if they wanted to could they do that? 16 <br /> 17 <br />Michael Harvey: I don’t know if I’m qualified to answer that question, what I will say is that an easement 18 <br />typically spells out use, it typically spells out what can and cannot happen in the easement and it typically 19 <br />would establish rights with respect to development coverage or whatnot. The question that arises that 20 <br />since it is an easement that is still on someone’s property, anything happening in that easement 21 <br />specifically the placement of impervious surface area, does impact the overall developmental ability of 22 <br />property consistent with the Unified Development Ordinance in the various limitations establishes therein. 23 <br />As this Board knows, Article 4, our watershed management program, establishes for certain protected 24 <br />and critical watershed overlay districts, impervious surface limits throughout the County. Some of which 25 <br />are 6% some of which can be as high 36%. It depends on where you are located. Mr. Zaragoza 26 <br />property I will testify to because I have firsthand knowledge is in the Cane Creek Protected Overlay 27 <br />district and has a fairly restrictive impervious limit. That’s what I feel comfortable responding to in 28 <br />answering that question. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Larry Wright: Any other questions from the Board? 31 <br /> 32 <br />Jeff Schmitt: Can we get counsel to comment relative to the easements and our purview about thinking 33 <br />about them impacting on them? 34 <br /> 35 <br />James Bryan: Yeah, I should have just let the Board go on, I wish I could speak for months about this 36 <br />based on a lot of implications and a lot of similarities but the short and sweet of it is that when you have 37 <br />any sort of, what you are really asking about is relevancy and this is not relevant to any of the standards. 38 <br />There are different sections of the UDO where easements are used as tools it’s not relevant to what the 39 <br />Board is deciding tonight. It’s something for the general courts of justice to deal with whether they’re 40 <br />granted an easement or not and what compensation they are given for that. What you’re looking for is 41 <br />the particular standards called out in the UDO that Mr. Harvey has provided with the Finding of Facts and 42 <br />anything whether those conditions are met and what could meet those conditions. The terms of specific 43 <br />easements are beyond the powers of this Board. That is succinct an answer I can give. 44 <br /> 45 <br />Jeff Schmitt: Thank you. 46 <br /> 47 <br />Larry Wright: Any other questions from the members of the Board? You stay there because you’re 48 <br />going to get a rebut, you’ll have an opportunity for a rebuttal. 49 <br /> 50 <br />Matthew Rhoads: I don’t actually have any questions for Mr. Zaragoza but I’ll respond to his comment to 51 <br />my summary if that’s ok? Instead of going after each person it might be more efficient to do it that way. 52 <br /> 53 <br />Larry Wright: Well then each person can have the opportunity for their rebuttal after yours so I’m trying 54 <br />to let you go right now. 55
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.