Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Approved 8/11/2014 <br /> <br />OC Board of Adjustment – 4/22/2014 Page 66 of 69 <br /> 1 <br />Ordinance <br />Requirements <br />PLANNING <br />STAFF <br />RECOMMENDED <br />FINDINGS <br />EVIDENCE SUBMITTED <br />TO SUPPORT <br />FINDINGS <br />BOA <br /> FINDINGS <br />Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (c) <br /> <br />The location and character <br />of the use, if developed <br />according to the plan <br />submitted, will be in <br />harmony with the area in <br />which it is to be located and <br />the use is in compliance <br />with the plan for the <br />physical development of <br />the County as embodied in <br />these regulations or in the <br />Comprehensive Plan, or <br />portion thereof, adopted by <br />the Board of County <br />Commissioners. <br /> Is __ Is Not Staff will remind the <br />Board there is the <br />following information <br />available, as submitted <br />by the applicant, related <br />to addressing this <br />requirement: <br />• The application <br />package and project <br />narrative contained <br />within Tab 3 of the <br />application booklet. <br />• Tab 36 of the <br />application booklet <br />contains an impact <br />analysis, completed <br />by David Smith, <br />indicating the project <br />will not impact the <br />value of adjacent <br />property. <br />• Tab 6 of the <br />application booklet <br />contains a site plan <br />denoting the projects <br />compliance with the <br />UDO. <br /> x Is __ Is Not <br /> 2 <br />Michael Harvey: On page 217 with respect to compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (c), the location and character of 3 <br />the use if developed according to the plan submitted will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and 4 <br />the use is in compliance with the plan for the physical development of the County as embodied in these regulations 5 <br />or in the Comprehensive Plan or portion thereof, adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. I will remind the 6 <br />board in tabs 3, 36 and 6 of the application packet, you have sufficient documentation detailing this as well as the 7 <br />application package as a whole. I will also remind the board that you have staff’s abstract in the record that provided 8 <br />an assessment of the various Comprehensive Plan Policies and Goals that we believe support the approval of this 9 <br />project. 10 <br /> 11 <br />MOTION made by Jeff Schmitt per the requirements of Section 5.3.2. (A) as required by the UDO, this plan will be in 12 <br />compliance with that. It has been demonstrated the plan will in fact enhance potential economic development in the 13 <br />area and provide additional safety through having additional access to 911 emergency but there will not be additional 14 <br />traffic to the nature of this site which will increase usage and destroy the harmony of the area and the testimony that 15 <br />has been included in the record shows that there will be no negative impact to the value of contiguous and/or 16 <br />property in the general area. Seconded by Mark Micol. 17 <br />VOTE: Unanimous 18 19