BOA minutes 042214 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Approved 8/11/2014 OC Board of Adjustment – 4/22/2014 Page 64 of 69 1 Ordinance Requirements PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDED FINDINGS EVIDENCE SUBMITTED TO SUPPORT FINDINGS BOA FINDINGS Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (a) Continued • The application booklet contains evidence demonstrating the need for the tower, provisions for guaranteeing the public’s safety and general welfare. 2 3 Michael Harvey: On pages 214 through 217, we have the required findings for Section 5.3.2 (A) Special Uses 4 General Standards. Please note these are three findings we do not make a recommendation on because they are 5 based on the sworn testimony and evidence that are entered into the record. These are that the use will maintain or 6 promote the public health, safety and general welfare if located where proposed and developed and operated 7 according to the plan as submitted. We don’t make a recommendation but remind you with respect to compliance 8 with this section is the application packet contains the necessary material in our estimation to justify an affirmative 9 finding specifically in Tab 3, the application narrative. Tab 36, the Site Impact Analysis prepared by David Smith, 10 tab 6 of the application packet which has the site plan, tabs 32 and 33 of this application packet containing the 11 approval of Orange County EMS and the sheriff’s office and all the relevant information as detailed. 12 13 MOTION made by Mark Micol to find in favor that the use will maintain and promote the public health, safety and 14 general welfare if located where proposed based on testimony of Karen Kemerait, the attorney for the applicant that 15 the additional tower will encourage the expansion of affordable high speed 4G access for the county and provide 16 equitable access to rural underserved areas and staff’s recommended findings. Seconded by Samantha Cabe. 17 VOTE: Unanimous 18 19 20 21