BOA minutes 042214 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Approved 8/11/2014 OC Board of Adjustment – 4/22/2014 Page 2 of 69 should read, “Those requirements when this special use permit…”. Line 47 should read, “… the ordinance did not 1 authorize them to require it. Sometimes the government over reaches.” 2 3 Jeff Schmitt: On page 22, line 38 should read, “…was approved to when it became effective, …” 4 5 Michael Harvey: On page 22, line 33 should read, “It had to do with Environmental Management.” 6 7 Larry Wright: On page 22, line 5 should read, …when the plat is recorded…”. 8 9 Michael Harvey: On page 23, line 1 should read, “…though it is 1998 and 1986…” Line 6 should read, They can. 10 There are …”. Line 19 should read, “The county did not have those in 1986.” Lines 34 and 35 should read, “…dear 11 friend that is what prompted…” Line 36 should read, “…of the IV-B-7-b amendments that they don’t apply…”. Line 12 41 should read, “…don’t make any recommendation…”. Line 43 should read, “This was the Orange County’s first 13 foray in anything…” Everything else had…”. 14 15 Mark Micol: Page 29, lines 8 through 11 is attributed to me but I can’t make heads or tails of that paragraph, what do 16 we do in that case? 17 18 James Bryan: You are talking about minutes particular to a subject matter that my office had to recuse itself from. 19 The other part is generally about minutes. It is this board’s prerogative to approve the minutes. It is a transcription 20 of what happened. It should be as accurate as possible. 21 22 Mark Micol: Can I make an amendment to strike my name and put undetermined. 23 24 Michael Harvey: Unidentified board member. 25 26 Larry Wright: (To James Bryan). Do you agree this is the way to proceed? 27 28 James Bryan: It is perfectly fine if that is how the board wishes to proceed. 29 30 Michael Harvey: I am like Larry you are taking a lot of this correspondence out of context. I think it is reasonable to 31 say an undetermined board member and move on. 32 33 Michael Harvey: On page 39, line 13 should read, “was approved in 1986 by its terms the project shall…”. Page 40, 34 line 2 should read, “It is to the south of the creek.” Line 8 should read, “I am looking at a small portion in the 100 35 year flood…” Line 9 should read, “…our argument is that the quality was not in this special use permit. The 36 regulations…” 37 38 David Blankfard: Page 35, line 13 should read, “I think the 1986 code…” Line 45 should read, “…being that sum of 39 the parts…”. Page 36, line 4 should read, “Where is that in the special use permit?” Line 5 should read, 40 “Specifically the five acre requirement.” 41 42 Michael Harvey: Page 41, line 10 should read, “…angles don’t meet….”. 43 44 David Blankfard: On page 121, line 26 should read, “…was in effect. The one that…” 45 46 MOTION made by Jeff Schmitt to approve minutes with corrections. Seconded by Mark Micol. 47 VOTE: Unanimous 48