Browse
Search
BOA minutes 110915
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Minutes
>
2015
>
BOA minutes 110915
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 9:15:11 AM
Creation date
3/7/2018 10:25:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/9/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
BOA agenda 110915
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Board of Adjustment\Agendas\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 1/11/2016 <br /> <br />OC Board of Adjustment – 11/9/15 Page 4 of 48 <br /> <br />Patrick Mallett: The Board would like to turn… 1 <br /> 2 Karen Barrows: Excuse me, is it possible for someone else… 3 <br /> 4 Michael Harvey: You can move up to the wall, but obviously and I apologize for the cramped quarters but this is what we have to 5 <br />work with. 6 <br /> 7 Patrick Mallett: Ok so as Mr. Harvey mentioned my name is Pat Mallett, I’m a Planner II with current planning and have been the 8 <br />primary staff person working on this case. As Michael mentioned, there’s a large abstract that has been entered into the record. 9 <br /> 10 Michael Harvey: Pat, I’m sorry, have you been sworn? 11 <br /> 12 Patrick Mallett: I have been duly sworn. 13 <br /> 14 Michael Harvey: Thank you. 15 <br /> 16 Patrick Mallett: Thank you for the reminder. This is the fairly standard format that we use for SUP. It includes site analysis, 17 <br />information about the property, the application as provided by the applicants, notification materials for both the neighborhood 18 <br />information meetings that is now required with SUP’s of all types, the staff comments from all departments and the findings of facts 19 <br />required for the SUP detailed within the UDO. And then there are various attachments, most important obviously is probably the 20 <br />site plan. And I’m just going to walk you through this, and then I believe both sides of the aisle have some presentation materials 21 <br />that they want. And I’ll, of course, answer any questions that you have. 22 <br /> 23 <br />So this is the site plan that was submitted, this version was updated with some additional clarifications and additional documents 24 <br />on October the 21st. It covers all of the site requirements that staff and UDO requires. First sheet is obviously the cover sheet. The 25 <br />second sheet shows the conditions of the property. It shows large significant trees, suitable soils, frontage along Morrow Mill and 26 <br />Millikan Road. It’s a 21.9 plus acre site plus or minus .2 acres. Largely wooded, by the way. This is the overall site plan with a blow 27 <br />up detail of the entry points along the public streets. The proposal is for a barn facility or barn like structure to be constructed that 28 <br />would support, theoretically, up to 250 person retreat facility. Total allowable occupancy will be dependent on some building code 29 <br />and occupancy issues that may drive that number up or down, but basically they’re committing to no more than 250 people. They 30 <br />have enough parking spaces, off street parking spaces here to support that number. There will be ADA accessibility for the site. A 31 <br />solid waste feature (dumpster) and then a service drive here. This driveway here is the drive that I believe in intended to be open 32 <br />to public. This would be a service entrance for staff. 33 <br /> 34 <br />This is an enlarged copy of the barn, the parking, how the ADA the handicap parking works and solid waste collection area. 35 <br /> 36 <br />This is an illustrative showing the landscape plan and how it complies with the landscape requirements around the parking areas. 37 <br />This is a blow up that shows both the lighting and how the lighting diminishes once it leaves the parking area of the barn. These 38 <br />circles, these outer circles I believe represent 0.5 food-candle limit consistent with the ordinance. This blow up which was one of 39 <br />the revisions that they made with our last submission, illustrates the buffers that are required as well as the building setbacks 40 <br />required by ordinance for the structure. Those revisions, by the way, did not change the size, location or nature of what was going 41 <br />on in here with the original submittal. These are detail sheets, they’re fairly standard. They cover all of the technical minutia per se. 42 <br />Same thing here, these details cover erosion controls and stormwater features for the project. 43 <br /> 44 <br />This is a graphic illustrating the barn. The side, front and side view, obviously. Another view, side and front of the barn. This is 45 <br />what they call a cross section. It’s too scale, this shows as you’re looking at the site and its features married with existing and 46 <br />saved vegetation and then the barn as it relates to the property and the property lines. Same thing, different cross-section, barn 47 <br />facility side view here. I would note that the typographic changes on this property are pretty slight. There’s not much fall occurring 48 <br />across the property. You can see that as evidenced in the cross section. This is a black line version, I believe the applicant’s got a 49 <br />color version of this and there’s a graphic propped up against the wall over there. But this is what is typically referred to as a 50 <br />rendering. It’s the same site plan, they just take out all the details and cover it up so it’s more understandable. This is the graphic 51 <br />to fix the proposed barn structure to the closest adjacent structures. I believe that is the last element. We’re just going to go over to 52 <br />the layout sheet for the rest. And as I said there are other attachments in here that pertains to processing the case but I think with 53 <br />that I’m willing to answer any questions or go through any of the specifics of the abstract materials and then turn it over to the 54
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.