Orange County NC Website
DRAFT <br /> <br />OC Board of Adjustment – 6/8/2015 Page 64 of 68 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />REQUIREMENT UDO SUPPORTING EVIDENCE Staff BOA <br />SPECIFIC STANDARDS <br />In accordance with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2), the Board of Adjustment shall also consider the following general <br />conditions before the application for a Special Use can be approved. <br /> <br />NOTE: Planning Staff does not provide a recommendation on these items as the Board is expected to act <br />based on the sworn testimony provided at the hearing. Staff is providing a brief synopsis of the information <br />contained within the submittal the applicant argues demonstrates compliance for reference purposes only. <br />The use (will / will not) maintain or <br />promote the public health, safety and <br />general welfare, if located where <br />proposed and developed and <br />operated according to the plan as <br />submitted. <br />Section 5.3.2 <br />(A) (2) (a) <br />Application package inclusive <br /> Narrative (TAB 3) <br /> Impact Analysis (TAB 21) <br /> Balloon Test (TAB 22) <br /> Site Plan <br />N/A <br /> <br />The use (will / will not) maintain or <br />enhance the value of contiguous <br />property (unless the use is a public <br />necessity, in which case the use <br />need not maintain or enhance the <br />value of contiguous property). <br />Section 5.3.2 <br />(A) (2) (b) <br />Application package inclusive <br /> Impact Analysis (TAB 21) <br /> Site Plan <br />Yes <br /> <br />The location and character of the <br />use, if developed according to the <br />plan submitted, (will / will not) be in <br />harmony with the area in which it is <br />to be located and the use is in <br />compliance with the plan for the <br />physical development of the County <br />as embodied in these regulations or <br />in the Comprehensive Plan, or <br />portion thereof, adopted by the Board <br />of County Commissioners. <br />Section 5.3.2 <br />(A) (2) (c) <br />Application package inclusive <br /> Narrative (TAB 3) <br /> Impact Analysis (TAB 21) <br /> Balloon Test (TAB 22) <br /> Site Plan <br />Yes <br /> 2 <br /> 3 <br />Larry Wright: On page 111, there is the application of components with its supporting evidence and we can 4 <br />comfortably go off this for page 111 and 112. 5 <br /> 6 <br />MOTION made by Samantha Cabe that for the recommendations we just reviewed with Mr. Harvey up to page 123 7 <br />that we adopt the 3 staff recommendations that were made and only address the ones that were left open for our 8 <br />decision. Seconded by David Blankfard. 9 <br />VOTE: Unanimous 10 <br /> 11 <br />Jeff Schmitt: The character of the property is changing it is not all rural anymore. There is a commercial venture, a 12 <br />commercial complex, a commercial venture as a nursing home. It is changing; does that affect the visual 13 <br />intrusiveness? I don’t know. 14 <br /> 15 <br />Larry Wright: Every place is changing. But is this change, does it follow th e intent of what the UDO is really trying to 16 <br />protect citizens in Orange County or to protect the county grow in development. 17