Browse
Search
BOA minutes 060815
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Minutes
>
2015
>
BOA minutes 060815
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 9:15:29 AM
Creation date
3/7/2018 10:22:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/8/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
BOA agenda 060815
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Board of Adjustment\Agendas\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />OC Board of Adjustment – 6/8/2015 Page 60 of 68 <br /> <br />REQUIREMENT UDO SUPPORTING EVIDENCE Staff BOA <br />STANDARDS for Telecommunication Facilities (continued) <br /> <br />Visual Impact Assessment <br />requirements <br />5.8.10 (B) <br />(3) (n) <br />Application (TAB 22), Applicant <br />Testimony. <br /> Yes <br /> <br />Demonstration that the wireless <br />support structure is sited so as to <br />have the least visually intrusive <br />effect reasonably possible and <br />have the least adverse visual effect <br />on the environment and its <br />character, on existing vegetation, <br />and on the residences in the area <br />of the telecommunications tower. <br />5.8.10 (B) <br />(3) (o) <br />Application (TAB(s) 19, 21, and 22), <br />Applicant testimony <br /> Yes <br /> <br />A statement, prepared by a <br />professional engineer licensed in <br />the State of North Carolina <br />certifying the tower's compliance <br />with applicable standards as set <br />forth in the State of North Carolina <br />Building Code, and any associated <br />regulations. <br />5.8.10 (B) <br />(3) (p) <br />Application (TAB 7), Applicant <br />Testimony <br />Yes <br /> <br />Proposed telecommunications <br />equipment planned cannot be <br />accommodated on an existing <br />wireless support structures <br />5.10.8 (B) <br />(4) (a) <br />Application (TAB 7), Applicant <br />Testimony <br />Yes <br /> <br />Location of Wireless Support <br />Structures <br />5.10.8 (B) <br />(4) (b) <br />Application inclusive with a specific <br />statement contained in TAB(s) 25 <br />and 33, Applicant Testimony, <br />Abstract. <br /> <br />The applicant is not by-passing a <br />‘higher priority’ site with the <br />proposal to erect a tower on this <br />property. There are no higher <br />priority sites in the area where a <br />tower can be located. <br />Yes <br />Fall zone setbacks of 110% of <br />tower height (not including lighting <br />rod) <br />5.10.8 (B) <br />(4) (c) <br />Site plan Yes <br />Access 5.10.8 (B) <br />(4) (d) <br />Site plan. Access shall be off of Mt. <br />Sinai Road. <br />Yes
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.