BOA minutes 060815 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

OC Board of Adjustment – 6/8/2015 Page 4 of 68 Secretary Debra Graham swore in the following individuals: 1 Thomas H. Johnson, Jr. David Smith Graham Herring Robert (Bob) Hill Lee Kerlin Robert Hornik Brack Hall Ann Hall Sue Wilkins Jeffrey Fisher Faye Olive Mark Waller Jon Blitz Beth Bega James M. Gibson Vicki Gibson Lois Madden David J. Madden Nancy Willson Susan Sachs Judy Martell Susan E. Suttons Rick Bartram Judson Edeburn Mary Edeburn Lyn Gould D. Kulousel Michael Nicosia Elizabeth Rusnak Pam Waller Cristen PennindocPeir Madison Dietz Michelle Dietz Margie Dietz David Pierce Cristina Pierce Carolina Diett Joanie Yeargan Megan Moore Judith Bishop Randy Bishop Yesica Poou Martinez Carrick Goldner Richard Goldner Tristran Ottwason Nicole Chemla Susan Schneider C. Randolph Bishop Judith Snyderman Lucas Moore Judith E. Dearlove Joan G. Peck Janet N. Ray Harriet Sayre McCord William Ray Jane Norton Luis Gulley Katy Phillips Scott Walden Daniel T. Gauss Patricia C. Smith Elia E. Villanueva Ben Philpot Jamie Barnhill Joy Martin Denise Olson 2 Michael Harvey: My name is Michael Harvey with the Current Planning Department for Orange County. I have been 3 sworn. I am going to briefly summarize the memorandum I have prepared for you and allow the applicant to present his 4 case. As has already been indicated, we are here to review a Class B Special Use Permit proposing the development 5 of a telecommunications facility at 5022 Kerley Road. In your packet, you have attachments. Most notably, on page 6 60, you have a Property Vicinity Map, on page 61 through 109; you have notification materials and certifications that 7 include balloon tests as well as the public hearing. Beginning on page 110, you have the Special Use Permit Findings 8 of Fact completed by staff. You will note there are a couple of places that staff did not make a determination. We will 9 get to that in a moment. Attachment 4 beginning on page 127, you have staff comments. You have an application 10 packet delivered by the applicant with a May 29 letter responding to some of the staff’s comments. You also have a 11 letter offered by Carolina Telecommunications Services, LLC, our telecommunications consultant, Jackie Hicks. You 12 have an email written by Mr. Patrick Young, a planner for the City of the Durham. The City of Durham reviewed the 13 telecommunication application as a courtesy. In this email, they have no comments on the proposal. You have a 14 notarized statement from me indicating the posting of the signs for the balloon test. Mr. Chairman, at this time, I would 15 like to enter the Abstract which includes Attachments 1, 2, 3, 4, the application package including an 11x17 and full 16 color copy of the site plan, the Carolina Telecommunications consultant’s recommendation, the email from the City of 17 Durham, my certification of signed posting as well as copies of the Unified Development Ordinance, the 2030 Adopted 18 Comprehensive Plan, into the record. 19 20 MOTION made by Jeff Schmitt to accept. David Blankfard seconded. 21 VOTE: Unanimous 22 23 Michael Harvey: I will summarize the information on pages 52 through 59 . You have a proposal to build a 129 foot tall 24 monopole as a 125 foot cell tower with a four foot lightning rod at 5022 Kerley Road with an Orange County parcel 25 identification number of 0801154353. This is the map showing the property and the anticipated location of the tower. 26 That is there for illustrative purposes only. It does not represent the actual location of the proposed tower. The 27 applicant is proposing as summarized on page 54 will be to erect a cell tower within 100 by 100 foot leased area o f this 28 parcel with a __________ of the tower and a 60 by 60 foot compound with access to the facility proposed from Mt. Sinai 29 Road. We have provided a brief breakdown of comments relating to this tower application we have received. 30 31