BOA minutes 060815 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

OC Board of Adjustment – 6/8/2015 Page 34 of 68 Tom Johnson: It says height obstructer 213.9 feet. 1 2 Bob Hornik: Somewhere in your report it said 170 feet. 3 4 Tom Johnson: I’m reading the report you presented to the board which was in Mr. Smith’s report. It says structure 5 characteristics ground elevation 548.3 feet height obstructer 213.9 feet overall height 762.2 feet. 6 7 Bob Hornik: I saw it somewhere. 8 9 Larry Wright: Ready to call your witness. 10 11 Bob Hornik: Ann Hall please. 12 13 Ann Hall: My name is Ann Hall, I live 5916 Mr. Sinai Road, Durham, NC 27705. 14 15 Larry Wright: Have you been duly sworn? 16 17 Ann Hall: Yes I have. I’m Rebecca Ann Hall speaking as an adjacent property at 5916 Mr. Sinai Road. My husband 18 and I live next door to the Bergman property where T-Mobile proposes to build a 125 foot cell tower. One of our 19 daughter’s lives next door at 5912 Mt. Sinai Road and the adjoining property beside 5906 Mt. Sinai also belongs to us. 20 All three of these properties and an additional tract at 5900 all adjoin the B ergman property on the back of the tracts of 21 land. I have lived here since 1957. All homes were built on the tracts of land in the 1930s on land purchased from the 22 Crabtree Farm which the Bergman property is part of his farm. Over the course of the past 58 years having been 23 raised on a large farm myself on the Orange County/Alamance County line in my younger years, I have seen and 24 enjoyed the farm, the horses and the rural agriculture setting her e at where I now reside. I can walk out my door in the 25 morning and listen to all and watch the horses and enjoy the perfect quiet character of the community. The cell tower 26 will intrude on the enjoyment of my property and surrounding property in our neighborhood. The plan for the tower I 27 have seen places it in the middle of an open field next door to our house. It will loom overhead just 137 feet from our 28 property line and maybe 150 feet from our house. There is no question that the cell tower will change the character for 29 this area and not in a positive way. People who visit their loved ones in the nursing home and those for an afternoon in 30 the area will be looking at an ugly metal tower, out of place instead of the beautiful countryside setting. The pictures 31 have been taken and are available to be seen. Since there is a tower behind the nursing home and have them told it is 32 not high enough to do the job. Why build a tower on the front side of the n ursing home where the property elevation is 33 not any higher. Grove Road at the top of the hill has a much higher elevation, which seems to me they would be 34 looking for a tract of land of this nature. At the top of the hill, on Kerley Road, you can see bui ldings at Duke University, 35 South Square Mall and buildings around the hospital in Chapel Hill from that point on the road. I feel there are other 36 locations that could be used that are more suitable with higher elevation. If the tower needs to be in this area for 37 whatever reasons, there are other locations where the tower can be built which would have less impact on us and the 38 community. There is a big open field behind our house as stated earlier. There is a copy of the Orange County GIS 39 aerial photograph which shows it. Our house is outlined in red. The open field is just above our property in the photo. 40 It is surrounded by trees that could be used as a buffer and has higher elevation located on the Ber gman property. This 41 seems a better location, less of an eyesore and much less of an impact on our property as well as not affecting a 42 neighborhood along a main road. We and others in surrounding areas even though it still joins our property if the tower 43 was there instead of in the field to the side of the house. We feel that being in a different location will not affect the 44 property value of our property if the tower is not built on Mt. Sinai Road. My husband and I will be the ones most 45 directly affected by the cell tower. We have worked very hard through the years for something of this nature to cause 46 our property to be of less value and we are opposed to the tower being built at this location on Mr. Sinai Road. It would 47 not be compatible and harmonious with the rural residential and agricultural c haracter around us which we feel is very 48 important in our lives. We appreciate your consideration in this matter and thank you. 49 50