Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Approved 3113117 <br />1 Evan Gwen: I guess another concern while I'm here would be that the proximity of the proposed <br />2 location to the Chatham County line is such that the increase cell service would benefit Chatham <br />3 County almost as much as it would Orange County and that would be somehting for the Board to <br />4 take into consideration as well. <br />5 <br />6 Michael Harvey: Just for the Board's edification, the Aquaduct Conference Center has been <br />7 mentioned twice. The Aquaduct Conference Center operates under a Class B SUP issued by this <br />8 body approximately 20 or some odd years ago. <br />9 <br />10 Samantha Cabe: Thank you. At this time I think, due to our standing rules, this Board must take a <br />11 vote whether to continue in session or adjourn and set a date for continuation of this hearing. <br />12 <br />13 (Unknown resident, not sworn): Ms. Counsel woman, I'd just like to pose to at this time ..... there <br />14 are at least myself, I'm here and I'm not represented by either attorney but it being a public <br />15 hearing it would be nice for, and I don't want to be first I don't want to jump in line of anyone else <br />16 here, but I think it would be nice for us to at least be heard tonight if there is a reconvene at <br />17 another time. <br />18 <br />19 Samantha Cabe: We'll take that into consideration. Thank you sir. <br />20 <br />21 Barry Katz: Well how many more witnesses do you have? <br />22 <br />23 John Price: I have two witnesses. I have Mr. Ogburn who will testify regarding the impact on <br />24 value. And I have Dan Levinson who is an electrical engineer who will testify regarding the cell <br />25 tower. <br />26 <br />27 Laura Goode: Just to let the Board know we plan to object to the testimony of the person who's <br />28 going to testify about the need for the tower pursuant to the North Carolina General Statutes. <br />29 <br />30 Samantha Cabe: At this time do I have a motion from the Board, let me ask Mr. Bryan here what <br />31 the correct procedure would be. Should we just have a motion to adjorn or may we discuss? <br />32 <br />33 James Bryan: You certainly may discuss. I think that what you should consider is practical matters <br />34 of decision fatigue. Just how tired you all are. I think you need to consider due process <br />35 consideration so everybody has an opportunity to be heard fully vetter. And keep in mind that you <br />36 guys are going to, after everybody's done, have to deliberate. <br />37 <br />38 Samantha Cabe: Do I have a motion from anyone on the Board or discussion about the proposal <br />39 from the citizen here to hear private citizens brief comments out of order? <br />40 <br />OC Board of Adjustment — 12/12/16 Page 75 of 156 <br />