Browse
Search
BOA minutes 121216
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Minutes
>
2016
>
BOA minutes 121216
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 9:14:19 AM
Creation date
3/7/2018 9:58:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/12/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
BOA agenda 121216
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Board of Adjustment\Agendas\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 3113117 <br />1 John Price: Ok. And so it was Verizon that selected the search ring? <br />2 <br />3 David Haughney: Yes, we did design the search ring. <br />4 <br />5 John Price: If you aren't granted this application that's pending before Orange County what will <br />6 you do to address the needs along Mt. Carmel Road? <br />7 <br />8 Laura Goode: I would object to that as argumentative, he is an RF manager and he has not been <br />9 hired or at this time evaluated alternative solutions at this point in time. <br />10 <br />11 John Price: And that's .... That's the whole point. The purpose for the question is to illicit what the <br />12 options are for building this single cell tower, 199 -foot cell tower, on this location. Is there an <br />13 alternative that would solve and address the problem along Mt. Carmel Road? And they know <br />14 there is and they know what that alternative is but they're unwilling to testify. <br />15 <br />16 Samantha Cabe: Mr. Price, this is not the time for an argument. I understand the point you're <br />17 making, I think we all understand your point. We have a set of questions to answer per our UDO. <br />18 And we understand your questioning and you'll be given a chance to argue at the end if you're <br />19 finished with your cross examination. I'm just trying to keep this on track because again we have <br />20 an hour left and I think there's still a lot of people here that want to be heard. <br />21 <br />22 John Price: Yes. Maybe staff can assist on this. But it's my understanding that the burden of proof <br />23 is upon Towercom. We've established that it meets all the requirements, and it has met all the <br />24 requirements of the ordinance, including consideration of alternatives. <br />25 <br />26 Samantha Cabe: And we're going to discuss all of that in our deliberation. But we're ruling on <br />27 summary judgement here, we have to collect all the information and make our decision at the end <br />28 and we get your point. You've made it. <br />29 <br />30 John Price: But I can't illicit the information that would assist you in the deliberation because they <br />31 won't answer the question. <br />32 <br />33 Michael Harvey: Madame Chair ....... can I ask for your indulgence and ask our <br />34 telecommunications consultant to address the Board on this line of questioning? <br />35 <br />36 Samantha Cabe: Absolutely. <br />37 <br />38 Michael Harvey: Thank you. This is Mr. Rusty Monroe. <br />39 <br />40 Rusty Monroe: Thank you Michael. <br />OC Board of Adjustment- 12/12/16 <br />Page 46 of 156 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.