Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Approved 3113117 <br />1 <br />2 John Price: This is redundent. <br />3 <br />4 David Smith: That the cell tower would have no adverse impact on property values of contiguous <br />5 property. <br />6 <br />7 Laura Goode: I don't have any further questions. <br />8 <br />9 John Price: On those properties that you did the match pair you said you compared similar <br />10 properties other than the fact that there was a cell tower on the other properties what else was <br />11 similar? <br />12 <br />13 David Smith: They were similar in size and design, one wasn't 2 -story, they were both traditional <br />14 ranch buildings. <br />15 <br />16 John Price: You're talking about the similarity between the other properties in your analysis, you're <br />17 not talking about similarity to the property contiguous to the cell tower, correct? <br />18 <br />19 David Smith: That's correct. These are two properties that were in different areas, correct. <br />20 <br />21 John Price: No further questions. <br />22 <br />23 Samantha Cabe: Do any members of the Board have questions for this witness? <br />24 <br />25 Barry Katz: You were talking about properties on Sunrise, right? Is Sunrise in a rural buffer? <br />26 <br />27 Michael Harvey: Yes. <br />28 <br />29 John Price: Sunrise or Sunset? You said in your report Sunset, I thought? <br />30 <br />31 David Smith: Sunrise. <br />32 <br />33 Barry Katz: It is in a rural buffer. <br />34 <br />35 Michael Harvey: I'm going to answer that questions following that it is. A telecommunications <br />36 tower that was reviewed in 2004 and 2005 when my tenure with the County started on Sunrise <br />37 Road. And it is in the rural buffer. It's on the outskirts of Chapel Hill. <br />OC Board of Adjustment — 12/12/16 Page 34 of 156 <br />