Orange County NC Website
Approved 3113117 <br />1 David Smith: No. Just based on that. <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />John Price: I don't have any further questions. <br />Laura Goode: I have a few follow up questions, thank you... And you did your report based on the <br />requirements of the Orange County code, is that correct? <br />David Smith: Correct. <br />Laura Goode: And the specific priming effect is that the use would maintain or enhance the value <br />of contiguous property, is that correct? <br />David Smith: That's correct. <br />Laura Goode: Did you evaluate the contiguous properties to the Butner family farm property? <br />David Smith: Yes. <br />Laura Goode: Is that an evaluation contained in your report? <br />David Smith: It wasn't an evaluation of his property's, it was an effect of value of the cell tower on <br />his properties. <br />Laura Goode: Ok. Contiguous meaning that you looked at the properties adjacent to the Butner <br />family farm trust property? <br />27 David Smith: Yes. <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />Laura Goode: Ok so ...... You've been asked about properties owned by the Gwen family that <br />were valued at $1,000,000, was that part of the contiguous properties that you reviewed as part of <br />your report? <br />David Smith: No, I believe they're further away. <br />Laura Goode: You were also asked about your statement in your report that you stated that the <br />greatest potential for impact from visibility of the tower is on single family residences, is that right? <br />OC Board of Adjustment — 12/12/16 Page 32 of 156 <br />