Browse
Search
BOA minutes 121216
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Minutes
>
2016
>
BOA minutes 121216
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 9:14:19 AM
Creation date
3/7/2018 9:58:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/12/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
BOA agenda 121216
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Board of Adjustment\Agendas\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 3113117 <br />1 <br />2 John Price: I object. I think the article speaks for itself. Mr. Smith who has not even reviewed the <br />3 article in order to comment. <br />4 <br />5 Samantha Cabe: Does anyone from the Board have an opinion about that objection? I would say <br />6 we can read the article for ourselves. <br />7 <br />8 Barry Katz: We haven't had any time to prepare this. So this is a survey? Ok. May I ask? Who's <br />9 being surveyed? Property owners or people who are considering purchasing property? <br />10 <br />11 John Price: My expert when he testifies... <br />12 <br />13 Barry Katz: Ok, he'll answer those questions. <br />14 <br />15 Samantha Cabe: At this time I think I would ask you to limit Mr. Smith's testimony just to his report <br />16 and we can refer to this for differences but I believe it might be more appropriate to have the <br />17 oppostion put in their report to evidence and then you can cross examine all these points. That <br />18 would be more... Thank you. <br />19 <br />20 Laura Goode: So based on the review that you did in your study in your report, what was your <br />21 opinion at the conclusion of this study? <br />22 <br />23 David Smith: It has no adverse impact effect on value. <br />24 <br />25 Laura Goode: Thank you. Do you have any questions? <br />26 <br />27 John Price: Are you offering into the record his impact analysis? Or has it been offered? <br />28 <br />29 Laura Goode: Yes, it's part of the application that's already been entered into the record. <br />30 <br />31 John Price: Ok, I have several objections to that analysis. Statements contained in the analysis. <br />32 And I'd like to start if I may by questioning the witness regarding those questions ........... those <br />33 issues. <br />34 <br />35 Samantha Cabe: Yes, and if you could just state your name for the record, your position and who <br />36 exactly you represent. <br />37 <br />OC Board of Adjustment — 12/12/16 Page 17 of 156 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.