Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />Approved 3113117 <br />David Haughney: I feel that I've already testified that we do have other solutions for UNC <br />Campus, including some of the technologies that you mentioned. It's an integral part of the <br />solution. <br />John Price: So you don't need the tower... <br />David Haughney: This tower is an integral part of that solution. It is going to be necessary yes. <br />John Price: So are you saying that the tower is not needed for the offload capacity at UNC <br />Campus? <br />Samantha Cabe: I think he's testified earlier that it's all part of a plan with the tower and the small <br />cells, as what I've heard him say at least three or four times. That it's all part of their plan to solve <br />these two problems that they've identified. Correct me if I'm wrong, but that's what I've heard him <br />say three or four times at this point, that the tower and the small cells are part of their plan. Am <br />wrong? Did you hear that? <br />(General multiple comments) <br />Samantha Cabe: And I'm just trying to cut to the chase and not keep repeating the same things. <br />John Price: Well it seemed to be... there's a contradiction here between on the one hand saying <br />that... <br />Samantha Cabe: Do you have any further questions for him? <br />John Price: Yes, yes. The proposed tower, as I understand the statements that have been made <br />into the record, TowerCom says in support of this proposed tower is that this proposed tower will <br />satisfy the needs, all the needs that you've identified. Is that correct? <br />David Haughney: Yes sir. <br />John Price: The tower by itself will do that? <br />David Haughney: Yes sir, it would. This is needed for identified service needs. I believe I already <br />explained that it's not the one and only solution for the UNC Campus area, obviously. <br />John Price: I think we're just disagreeing with the definition of service needs .... <br />Ben Levitan: If you look at Mount Carmel Church Road... <br />Samantha Cabe: Ok, hang on one second. We're getting a little back and forth here. We've <br />already addressed you, you've testified, we've cross - examined you, do you have any further <br />questions for Mr. Haughney. <br />John Price: I have not further questions for Mr. Haughney. <br />Samantha Cabe: Alright. Does the Board have any questions for Mr. Haughney? Alright, thank <br />you. Are there any other members of the public who would like to be heard? Either in support of or <br />opposition? <br />OC Board of Adjustment — 12/12/16 Page 128 of 156 <br />