BOA minutes 121216 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Approved 3113117 1 Ben Levitan: This is from the application. Ok, and the left is the before of the existing condition 2 and the right is what improvement the tower is going to provide. You can see the yellow line on 3 the left chart, that's Mount Carmel Church Road. And you can see red is really good coverage, 4 green is pretty good coverage, blue and gray that's pretty spotty coverage. That certainly could 5 use some improvement. Alright now, on that same chart look, there's another road to the left, just 6 a black line. That's 15 -501. You can see when you're driving off 15 -501 that's pretty good 7 coverage up and down that road. Ok so, this is what's existing. Go to the right side of the page 8 and what you can see is this is what's going to change. Alright, look at the yellow line. We would 9 like that yellow line, we would like the coverage to look like it does on 15 -501. We still have major 10 gaps. This new cell tower that's been added here provides so good coverage right around the 11 tower itself, but you're driving along Mount Carmel Church Road and you've still got big gaps in 12 service. It's not fulfilling the goal. The way to fulfill the goal here would be to put three 27 -50 -foot 13 towers along this road. Especially where that big blue gap is and that would solve the problem 14 from Mount Carmel Church Road. This tower's obviously not solving the problem. You can see 15 right from their own propagation survey. You're in that spot with still that power. Ok so that's the 16 number one reason I don't think this tower fulfills goal number one. Let's go to goal number two: 17 offload UNC's cell tower. Ok look at the coverage on the left side. We've got this valley of 18 coverage pretty much where Mount Carmel Church Road still is. You can see south of the UNC 19 Campus it's blue, it's gray, it's light blue. Kind of poor coverage there. Look at the right. You still 20 have that valley of coverage. You basically... you can see the lower, you can see where the UNC 21 Campus coverage starts in green. That does not change substantially. I mean, this is a big 22 investment. Putting up a cell tower is a million bucks and it's going to be $20,000 - $30,000 a year 23 to maintain. About $20,000 on leases and electricity is what? $500 a month, by itself. Broadband 24 is going to be about $1,500 a year. If you're going to invest in coverage you're going to make sure 25 it actually fulfills the goal. It does not fulfill either of these goals, and that's my argument here. 26 27 John Price: (Inaudible) 28 29 Ben Levitan: Ok. So that's... I can stop there. And those are my two major points I want to bring 30 out. The technical design to solve these problems is completely different than what's being 31 proposed. 32 33 John Price: Which brings me to my next question, which is in this letter of August 11, 2016, again, 34 Exhibit 4 to the application. Mr. Haughney states, "There are no alternative technologies available 35 which could provide the needed increase to coverage and capacity offload in the Clearwater Lake 36 area without the proposed new telecommunication tower ". Do you agree? 37 38 Ben Levitan: It's absolutely wrong. That's incorrect. You can see from this that it does not solve 39 the problem. The alternatives, I've already stated: For UNC I would put small cells or enhanced 40 coverage within the campus, and for Mount Carmel Church Road you want smaller, targeted cell 41 towers. Cell towers, like I said, is like a radio station. Normally they put up the cell tower and it 42 provides coverage in a circular area around it. So on highways where you have specific problems, 43 like 1 -40, any highway, you don't make a circular cell tower. You put up a cell tower and you focus 44 it to go up and down the road because that's where you need the coverage. If you've got a lawn 45 sprinkler at home you understand this, you've got that strip at the front of your house that you 46 want to cover. You don't put a circular sprinkler on that because that water's going to mostly go 47 out in the street. On that strip you point these little sprinklers that point left and right that are going 48 to cover just the strip. So what's really needed for Mount Carmel Church Road is maybe one or 49 two smaller cell towers. I'd say 27 -foot to 50 -foot maximum and they can be stealth that are just 50 pointed straight up and down that road to provide focused coverage on that. On top of that can be OC Board of Adjustment — 12/12/16 Page 108 of 156