BOA minutes 101016 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Approved 12/12/16 OC Board of Adjustment – 10/10/16 Page 110 of 113 1 Barry Katz: I’m pointing to these findings as suggested by our attorney because going forward there will be 2 some relevance to these findings in future activity related to this. 3 4 James Bryan: Yeah, and as a reminder this is going to be reduced to writing and the Chair has to sign it. So 5 if you could, if you were going by this, list numbers for the secretary to jot down. That might be easier. 6 Barry Katz: Let’s call out the numbers. Did you say 4? 7 8 Karen Barrows: I said 4. 9 10 Barry Katz: 4. I’m sorry, I have to go through all of this again to make any kind of sense of what I… 11 12 Susan Halkiotis: Well 11 and 12. 13 14 Barry Katz: Yeah, 11 and 12. 13. This is essentially the same building so that would be 14 and 15. The 15 whole traffic analysis, etcetera, DOT, the driveway, all of this is related to the events, 19. 16 17 Susan Halkiotis: It might be easier to see if there are any you want to exclude. 18 19 Barry Katz: Well I don’t know about that. Well I would put in 24. Yeah, well 25. And 26, 27, 28, and 29 20 relates the wastewater treatment, which again speaks to the fact that this is reiteration of the plan that we 21 saw last year. I would put in 35 because this is where the testimony of Ms. Brewer comes in, as far as the 22 intent of what it is that she had in mind all the time that she was developing this plan. 23 24 Karen Barrows: Do you have an issue with 49? 25 26 Barry Katz: Well I mentioned 49, that’s true. 27 28 Susan Halkiotis: 46 and 47? 29 30 Barry Katz: 46, and 47. And then we get to the appellants. I would certainly include 56, 57, 58, as it relates 31 to the fact that they also have rights to their property, their agricultural property. And whether the purported 32 use would interfere with their rights. 33 34 Karen Barrows: We’re here to entertain a motion. Matt did you have anything? 35 36 Barry Katz: I move that we adopt the ruling number 2 that reverses the decision and as it states there, do I 37 have this right? Orange County Planning Director or the designee shall review the building permit 38 application, make a determination as to whether the structure identified will be used for a bona fide farm 39 purpose and whether the use as a wedding and event center is related to or incidental to such bona fide 40 farm purposes, if any. Ok? And then part b, the appellant has requested that this Board grant a stay of 41 building permit effected by the issue being appealed until such time that the determination is made by the 42 current Planning supervisor that is either a structure that will be used as a bona fide purpose or there is a 43 related valid zoning compliance permit. 44 45 Karen Barrows: Can I just ask James, do we have the power to stay? 46 47 Barry Katz: Can we really do that? 48 49