Browse
Search
BOA minutes 031317
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Minutes
>
2017
>
BOA minutes 031317
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 9:13:58 AM
Creation date
3/6/2018 4:48:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/13/2017
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
BOA agenda 031317
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Board of Adjustment\Agendas\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APPROVED 6/12/17 <br />1 <br />2 Barry Katz: What? <br />3 <br />4 James Bryan: Can we call out a few, the findings of facts as an addendum to that motion that Barry <br />5 and Susan said about the scale, <br />6 <br />7 Karen Barrows: The scale of the infrastructure is clearly to support an anticipated 250 guests, <br />8 wastewater and well permits, parking, <br />9 <br />10 Barry Katz: Yeah. <br />11 <br />12 Karen Barrows: Which is not incidental. <br />13 <br />14 Matt Hughes: Is there something I need to do or do I just need a second? <br />15 <br />16 Barry Katz: I'm not sure, are we ready for a second? We need to fill that out further. <br />17 <br />18 Karen Barrows: Alright, I need to go. <br />19 <br />20 Barry Katz: Ok, then we're good. <br />21 <br />22 Matt Hughes: Are you seconding that motion? <br />23 <br />24 Barry Katz: I'll second that motion, <br />25 <br />26 Matt Hughes: Ok, <br />27 <br />28 Karen Barrows: Any further discussion? <br />29 <br />30 Matt Hughes: Well the only further discussion I have is even though I did make the motion I do <br />31 want to make another motion, which is to divide the question so that we can vote on each <br />32 component individually. <br />33 <br />34 Karen Barrows: Should we vote on this motion first? <br />35 <br />36 Matt Hughes: Well there are components of the motion I'd like to vote for and components I'd like <br />37 to vote against by dividing the question, which is a non - debatable motion that does require a <br />38 majority vote and a second; it would just allow us to vote on each individual item, however I have <br />39 the feeling that each individual item will prevail anyway so the motion will pass. If I had to look into <br />40 the metaphorical crystal ball, but that's my additional motion is that we divide the question. <br />41 <br />42 LeAnn Brown: James, I don't mean to intercede but so we don't have a procedural problem; if <br />43 Matt's desire of splitting the motion it might be better procedurally now that you've written down <br />44 what he says for someone who's going to vote for the motion to make it or someone who's going to <br />45 vote for it to second it for Matt to then move to separate the three questions and the Board can <br />46 then take the questions because I think under most procedures it would be improper for a person <br />57 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.