Browse
Search
BOA minutes 031317
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Minutes
>
2017
>
BOA minutes 031317
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 9:13:58 AM
Creation date
3/6/2018 4:48:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/13/2017
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
BOA agenda 031317
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Board of Adjustment\Agendas\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APPROVED 6/12/17 <br />1 Susan Halkiotis: Right. Because, and the word separate, I mean specifically means not related or <br />2 incidental to. So it's an interesting way of putting it. <br />3 <br />4 Karen Barrows: Mm -Hmm. <br />5 <br />6 Susan Halkiotis: That I hadn't really considered before. But you're right, it's two separate <br />7 businesses and one of them, they're not incidental or related to each other. You know, in fact, as 1 <br />8 said earlier I think one of them if we would, if we had to make that determination then the flower <br />9 and chestnut and honey business to me are the ones that, you know, are subjugated. So I don't <br />10 know if that does anything for anybody else on the Board or not. <br />11 <br />12 Karen Barrows: Makes sense. <br />13 <br />14 Susan Halkiotis: And I don't know what options that gives us to consider that. To consider it as two <br />15 separate businesses. <br />16 <br />17 James Bryan: I think you could look at the question as when Michael Rettie, the building inspector, <br />18 sends over the building permit application and says to Michael, Michael Harvey, look at this. And <br />19 now you guys are in that place. <br />20 <br />21 Barry Katz: You can't have a wedding. <br />22 <br />23 James Bryan: You can say it is exempt for these purposes and a zoning compliance permit would <br />24 be required for these purposes. So the, I believe that in you, you've got the building permit <br />25 application; it has a little section for purposes where there are several different things mentioned <br />26 and then you've had three nights, two hearings of all these different purposes. So I think you've got <br />27 enough evidence to say you know, for these purposes it is exempt for these purposes, a zoning <br />28 compliance permit is required. <br />29 <br />30 Barry Katz: Can we put that under motion? Is that? Are we ready to do that from you perspective? <br />31 <br />32 James Bryan: Yeah let's start figuring it out. So. <br />33 <br />34 Barry Katz: We're talking now about a building permit, and about parameters for a building permit, <br />35 correct? <br />36 <br />37 James Bryan: We are, we are not talking about a building permit in a technical sense in that that is <br />38 outside of this Board's jurisdiction. You all are merely stepping into the shoes of the zoning <br />39 administration saying whether a zoning compliance permit is required for a particular use or if that <br />40 use is exempt by the UDO and the Statutes as being a farm purpose. <br />41 <br />42 Barry Katz: Fine. Our motion would, considering what the consensus seems to be, what majority of <br />43 the Board feels is that zoning permit; a zoning permit? <br />44 <br />45 Susan Halkiotis: A zoning permit. <br />46 <br />47 James Bryan: Zoning compliance permit. <br />51 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.