Browse
Search
BOA agenda 061217
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Agendas
>
2017
>
BOA agenda 061217
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2018 4:37:54 PM
Creation date
3/6/2018 4:36:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/12/2017
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br /> 57 <br /> 1 <br />Barry Katz: What? 2 <br /> 3 <br />James Bryan: Can we call out a few, the findings of facts as an addendum to that motion that Barry 4 <br />and Susan said about the scale. 5 <br /> 6 <br />Karen Barrows: The scale of the infrastructure is clearly to support an anticipated 250 guests, 7 <br />wastewater and well permits, parking. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Barry Katz: Yeah. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Karen Barrows: Which is not incidental. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Matt Hughes: Is there something I need to do or do I just need a second? 14 <br /> 15 <br />Barry Katz: I’m not sure, are we ready for a second? We need to fill that out further. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Karen Barrows: Alright, I need to go. 18 <br /> 19 <br />Barry Katz: Ok, then we’re good. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Matt Hughes: Are you seconding that motion? 22 <br /> 23 <br />Barry Katz: I’ll second that motion. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Matt Hughes: Ok. 26 <br /> 27 <br />Karen Barrows: Any further discussion? 28 <br /> 29 <br />Matt Hughes: Well the only further discussion I have is even though I did make the motion I do 30 <br />want to make another motion, which is to divide the question so that we can vote on each 31 <br />component individually. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Karen Barrows: Should we vote on this motion first? 34 <br /> 35 <br />Matt Hughes: Well there are components of the motion I’d like to vote for and components I’d like 36 <br />to vote against by dividing the question, which is a non-debatable motion that does require a 37 <br />majority vote and a second; it would just allow us to vote on each individual item, however I have 38 <br />the feeling that each individual item will prevail anyway so the motion will pass. If I had to look into 39 <br />the metaphorical crystal ball, but that’s my additional motion is that we divide the question. 40 <br /> 41 <br />LeAnn Brown: James, I don’t mean to intercede but so we don’t have a procedural problem; if 42 <br />Matt’s desire of splitting the motion it might be better procedurally now that you’ve written down 43 <br />what he says for someone who’s going to vote for the motion to make it or someone who’s going to 44 <br />vote for it to second it for Matt to then move to separate the three questions and the Board can 45 <br />then take the questions because I think under most procedures it would be improper for a person 46
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.