Browse
Search
BOA agenda 061217
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Agendas
>
2017
>
BOA agenda 061217
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2018 4:37:54 PM
Creation date
3/6/2018 4:36:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/12/2017
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br /> 33 <br />want you to understand that that is where this is located. It is part of the zoning power. Section a is 1 <br />the grant of power and section b1 begins the process of talking about the farm exemption. This 2 <br />particular section of chaptern153a is called “Part 3 Zoning”. Now, why on earth did I just tell you 3 <br />something as boring as that? Well, here’s why. If you look at the statute that you have before you 4 <br />and the statute that Mr. Harvey was looking at, what the statute says about farms is that 5 <br />regulations; what kind of regulations? Regulations may effect property used for bona fide farm. 6 <br />Used for a bona fide farm. Only for the purposes set out in paragraph three. But, this subdivision 7 <br />does not limit regulation under this part with respect to the use of farm property for non-farm 8 <br />purposes. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Barry Katz: Where does it say? Oh there it is. 11 <br /> 12 <br />LeAnn Brown: Do you have the copy there in front of you? Can you see it? 13 <br /> 14 <br />Barry Katz: Yeah. I got it. 15 <br /> 16 <br />LeAnn Brown: So what that means in a more common way of speaking is that the legislature does 17 <br />not intend the farm exemption that it is telling you about here to apply to the zoning regulations, this 18 <br />part, all zoning in the Counties in the State of North Carolina, to the extent that someone is making 19 <br />a non farm use of farm property. In other words, under this statutory structure delightfully written as 20 <br />it may be, what the statute means is that there is a multipart test. First question; is the property 21 <br />farm property at all? Is it a bona fide farm? An the legislature spends a great deal of that statute 22 <br />telling us what things a County can look at or must look at to decide whether it’s farm property at 23 <br />all. If it’s not farm property at all we don’t have the rest of this conversation. So we go through and 24 <br />look at whether it’s farm property. And the test is very simple. The legislatures made the test pretty 25 <br />easy. If you’ve got a farm number then you get to walk down the path of being a farm property. If 26 <br />you’ve got a forestry plan, even if it’s on top of your septic system, you get to be considered a farm 27 <br />property. And so, we have not contended that Ms. Brewer doesn’t have either of those things and 28 <br />some other things that fit those statutory tests. We, we’re not… they then went out and bought a 29 <br />farm in another County and had some chestnuts there and I’m not contending that whatever they 30 <br />did there couldn’t apply back to determine whether this is farm property. So we are not here to take 31 <br />issue with whether the dirt is farm property. It’s got all the requisites to be farm property. That does 32 <br />not mean that this property is exempt from the zoning ordinance of Orange County in a vacuum. 33 <br />What that means is that you get to look at whether the exemption applies. And what happened in 34 <br />this case originally is that Michael Harvey did exactly that. He looked at the issue of whether this 35 <br />property could be considered farm property and then he looked at the use that was proposed and 36 <br />he looked at the paperwork that had been provided to him and he said, you know, this is a non 37 <br />farm use. And because this is a non-farm use this individual needs a Special Use Permit in order to 38 <br />have this use on this property that might otherwise be farm property. Mr. Harvey was absolutely 39 <br />right. Mr. Harvey’s decision that this particular use is a non-farm use and required a Special Use 40 <br />Permit is absolutely correct. And the logic of that decision then follows through with the decision 41 <br />that you made as a Board. Because you looked at this use and you looked at the impact of this 42 <br />use. Look at that picture again. Look at that asphalt farm, with that gigantic barn sitting on it. You 43 <br />look at that picture and you know that this particular use is not related to farming at all. It may be on 44 <br />farm property, but it is not related to farming at all. It is a wedding venue. It was advertised as a 45 <br />wedding venue, you analyzed it as a wedding venue, and you were given an honest application 46 <br />saying, here’s my wedding venue, can I do this? And you decided that based upon the enormous 47
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.