Orange County NC Website
DRAFT <br /> 13 <br />LeAnn Brown: Did anybody review it? 1 <br /> 2 <br />Michael Harvey: It was reviewed by staff, specifically the Planning Director for Orange County, as 3 <br />well as representatives of the County’s Attorney Office. 4 <br /> 5 <br />LeAnn Brown: Without telling me any advice you may have received were you given advice and 6 <br />counsel about the content of the order from the County Attorney’s Office. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Michael Harvey: I’m sorry, can you specify? You’re talking about the order or the letter? 9 <br /> 10 <br />LeAnn Brown: The letter. 11 <br /> 12 <br />Michael Harvey: I was given advice in direction from both the Planning Director and options from 13 <br />the County’s Attorney Office in terms of solidifying the order, which is County Exhibit 2. And 14 <br />information was provided in terms of articulating staff’s response from both the Director and the 15 <br />County’s Attorney Office, with respect to the November 7th letter. 16 <br /> 17 <br />LeAnn Brown: Is your? And if you answered a question from Mr. Katz a few moments ago about 18 <br />the fact that you had at one time been of the opinion that this particular use did require a Special 19 <br />Use Permit, is that correct? 20 <br /> 21 <br />Michael Harvey: Correct. 22 <br /> 23 <br />LeAnn Brown: Was that opinion based on your interpretation of North Carolina law at the time? 24 <br /> 25 <br />Michael Harvey: It was based on my interpretation not only North Carolina law, but the evidence I 26 <br />had at my disposal the times the determination was made. 27 <br /> 28 <br />LeAnn Brown: And your current decision is based upon our belief that you are bound by the 29 <br />statements made in an affidavit as to use? 30 <br /> 31 <br />Michael Harvey: My determination at this time is based on interpretation of existing State law and 32 <br />consultation with advice presented by the County’s Attorney’s Office and the record of CB16-0020 33 <br />to which, yes ma’am, did include an affidavit, as well as documentation articulating the status of the 34 <br />property as a farm as defined by NCGS. 35 <br /> 36 <br />LeAnn Brown: And did you consider in forming your determination in response to the remand from 37 <br />the Board of Adjustment any of the evidence that was given during their two-day hearing? 38 <br /> 39 <br />Michael Harvey: No. 40 <br /> 41 <br />LeAnn Brown: None of the evidence whatsoever was considered by you in making that 42 <br />determination? 43 <br /> 44 <br />Michael Harvey: For my determination relied on the definition as prescribed by Statutes, the 45 <br />information we had on record at the time, as well as the direction provided by the Board of 46 <br />Adjustment in terms of what they had asked staff to do. Specifically, whether the structure identified 47