Browse
Search
BOA agenda 031317
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Agendas
>
2017
>
BOA agenda 031317
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2018 4:35:07 PM
Creation date
3/6/2018 4:26:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/13/2017
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
BOA minutes 031317
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Board of Adjustment\Minutes\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br /> <br />OC Board of Adjustment – 11/9/15 Page 92 of 156 <br /> <br />Michael Ogburn: Yes sir. 1 <br /> 2 <br />Matt Hughes: It focuses mostly on New Zealand, there’s some reference to some other places as 3 <br />well but, work me through how appraisals… How could appraisals be different in another country? 4 <br />Does that make sense? 5 <br /> 6 <br />Michael Ogburn: Oh yeah, so. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Matt Hughes: Is there some sort of professional standard no matter where you are, let’s say 9 <br />between the United States and Canada and New Zealand would not adhere to those? 10 <br /> 11 <br />Michael Ogburn: What we would anticipate is the same economic factors are going to be in play in 12 <br />New Zealand as they are in the United States, but what I have generally found to be true 13 <br />regardless of where you live most people are pretty doggone much the same. And if they don’t 14 <br />like to look at metal poles in New Zealand they probably don’t like to look at them in Orange 15 <br />County either. Ok, so, did I rely on this as a basis for my conclusions? No sir. I believe that it is 16 <br />supportive of those conclusions that I drew, yes sir. What I’m saying is I’m not the only one out 17 <br />there that came to this conclusion. Now, they did a much more thorough study than I did. They 18 <br />don’t pay appraisers to do studies… I do a lot of preservation easements on historic properties 19 <br />and that type of thing. The articles that were written for it were 40 and 50 years ago. They’re still 20 <br />the only articles out there where they’ve measured the effects, so this is not unusual for us then to 21 <br />use something that was published in, for appraisers the Journal, and this is a good stay. And there 22 <br />just hasn’t been anything else. Oh, these same people did write some others but this was the one. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Barry Katz: Well as far as the EMF stuff goes, the magnetic field varies with the distance from the 25 <br />source. 26 <br /> 27 <br />Michael Ogburn: That is what I understand also. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Barry Katz: To the fourth power, which means if you double the distance there’s 10,000 times less 30 <br />influence, and you’re talking about a quarter of a mile away. You’re getting more from holding your 31 <br />phone to your ear. It’s not really relevant to this, in reality. Your point is what people’s impressions 32 <br />are. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Michael Ogburn: That’s correct. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Barry Katz: That’s all it is. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Michael Ogburn: That’s all it is. 39 <br /> 40 <br />Barry Katz: And your opinion about this. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Michael Ogburn: So again, all I’m saying is if there are people out there that perceive that to be 43 <br />true, I’m not saying it is, but if it is it’s going to adverse affect our demand curve. 44 <br /> 45 <br />Barry Katz: I have a question about demand and your opinion about this. 46 <br /> 47 <br />Michael Ogburn: Yes sir. 48 <br /> 49 <br />94
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.