Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
DRAFT <br /> <br />OC Board of Adjustment – 11/9/15 Page 80 of 156 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />John Price: Yes I think the last witness was Evan Gwen. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Samantha Cabe: I’m sorry? 4 <br /> 5 <br />John Price: Evan Gwen. 6 <br /> 7 <br />Samantha Cabe: Yes. 8 <br /> 9 <br />John Price: And we finished with Mr. Gwen. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Samantha Cabe: Ok. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Michael Harvey: Madame Chair, if we could have a formal motion to reconvene the public hearing. 14 <br /> 15 <br />Samantha Cabe: Oh, sure. Can I have a motion to reconvene the public hearing? 16 <br /> 17 <br />Motion made by Karen Barrows to reconvene the public hearing. Seconded by Matt Hughes. 18 <br /> 19 <br />VOTE: Unanimous 20 <br /> 21 <br />Samantha Cabe: Alright, we will reconvene. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Michael Harvey: And I will ask was there anybody who signed up this evening that was not sworn 24 <br />at the December regular meeting? If I could get those who would like to speak to come forward so 25 <br />we can swear you in at this time. And those who have already been sworn just remember you will 26 <br />need to restate for the record your name, that you were sworn, and that you were sworn at the 27 <br />December meeting. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Michael Harvey swore in a member of the public. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Michael Harvey: Again, when you come up to speak just state your name, your address, and that 32 <br />you were sworn for the record. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Karen Barrows: Before we start I have a question for Mr. Price if that’s ok. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Samantha Cabe: Sure. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Karen Barrows: Mr. Price, I was reading over some of the material you submitted to Michael or 39 <br />someone after we met last time where you said you thought the meeting was not conducted 40 <br />properly. Do you mind telling the Board what you were thinking about? 41 <br /> 42 <br />John Price: All I was referring to on that was that I was not allowed to cross-examine the experts 43 <br />for Verizon and TowerCom with respect to the alternatives considered and why certain 44 <br />alternatives were not considered technical issues. And I think the primary objection was that under 45 <br />the North Carolina statutes you’re not allowed to require an applicant to disclose confidential 46 <br />information so one of my… 47 <br /> 48 <br />Laura Goode: It was not confidential. It’s proprietary information. 49 <br /> 50 <br />82