Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
DRAFT <br /> <br />OC Board of Adjustment – 11/9/15 Page 56 of 156 <br /> <br />James Bryan: Yeah, I think that’s an extraordinary request. I don’t think it has to be granted. 1 <br /> 2 <br />Samantha Cabe: Does any of the Board want to hear questions from attorney for the other sides 3 <br />attorney? If you do, that’s fine. I’m just trying to keep this on track and it’s not typical that 4 <br />attorney’s ask each other questions. 5 <br /> 6 <br />John Price: The reason for the questioning is to find out why information pertaining to the 7 <br />timbering is not included in the application that was prepared by Ms. Goode, and submitted by Ms. 8 <br />Goode to the Board for the permit. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Samantha Cabe: And given that explanation does that change anyone’s mind? Then, no sir. Go 11 <br />ahead and proceed with your witness. 12 <br /> 13 <br />John Price: Could I tender for the record …. for purposes of the record the questions I would have 14 <br />asked? That’s what’s typically done in court. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Samantha Cabe: Sure. Typically in court attorney’s aren’t allowed to question other attorneys’. 17 <br /> 18 <br />John Price: Correct. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Samantha Cabe: You can tender your questions. If you have a piece of paper we don’t need to sit 21 <br />here and listen to them all. Am I out of line counsel? 22 <br /> 23 <br />James Bryan: A copy should be given to the clerk. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Samantha Cabe: Do we have access to make a copy of those for him, if he wants to tender them 26 <br />on paper? 27 <br /> 28 <br />Michael Harvey: Yes. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Samantha Cabe: Ok. Would you like us to make you copies so you can submit those in writing? 31 <br /> 32 <br />John Price: The purpose of this is to find out why this was not disclosed to the Board in this 33 <br />application. And I don’t know anyone else I can call as a witness for the applicant who can answer 34 <br />that question. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Samantha Cabe: Mr. Price, with all due respect we don’t need you to argue with us. That is not a 37 <br />requirement of what we are being asked to consider. Whether or not the owner of this property 38 <br />plans to timber their property some time in the future is not related to their application. 39 <br />58