Orange County NC Website
DRAFT <br /> <br />OC Board of Adjustment – 11/9/15 Page 53 of 156 <br /> <br />John Yeagley: I’m sure there’s utility poles, but we don’t co-locate on utility poles when we’re 1 <br />looking for 190-foot tower. We look for a high power electric transmission towers to meet that 2 <br />need. 3 <br /> 4 <br />John Price: Does this regulation state it’s limited to co-location? Would you typically co-locate on a 5 <br />utility pole? 6 <br /> 7 <br />John Yeagley: Ok. Can you define utility pole? 8 <br /> 9 <br />John Price: A power line pole. 10 <br /> 11 <br />John Yeagley: When I’m assigned a search ring, I look for parameters. The parameters for this 12 <br />search were for a 190-foot tower and there are no structures that are even close to that height in 13 <br />that area that could meet that need. Or within 2-miles. 14 <br /> 15 <br />John Price: So it’d be in responding as to whether you have or had not complied with these 16 <br />ordinance as I’ve been reciting are you limited your search solely to places that 195-foot cell tower 17 <br />could be located? Or on which all of the equipment could be co-located to a tower of a similar 18 <br />size? 19 <br /> 20 <br />John Yeagley: Not fully 195-feet. Sometimes we look for something, you know 170. But in this 21 <br />case 190 was our goal. 22 <br /> 23 <br />John Price: So you just did not consider at all other structures? 24 <br /> 25 <br />Laura Goode: Again, at this point in time I would object to asking an answer he’s already testified 26 <br />to what searches he looked at and what were available within the search area. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Samantha Cabe: For clarification, the testimony I heard is that you looked for other structures that 29 <br />are required by the ordinance and if there’s anything close you will investigate that but here there 30 <br />was nothing close to that height requirement. 31 <br /> 32 <br />John Yeagley: Correct. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Samantha Cabe: That’s what I interpreted from what you said. 35 <br /> 36 <br />John Yeagley: Yes. 37 <br /> 38 <br />55