Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
DRAFT <br /> <br />OC Board of Adjustment – 11/9/15 Page 34 of 156 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />John Price: This is redundent. 2 <br /> 3 <br />David Smith: That the cell tower would have no adverse impact on property values of contiguous 4 <br />property. 5 <br /> 6 <br />Laura Goode: I don’t have any further questions. 7 <br /> 8 <br />John Price: On those properties that you did the match pair you said you compared similar 9 <br />properties other than the fact that there was a cell tower on the other properties what else was 10 <br />similar? 11 <br /> 12 <br />David Smith: They were similar in size and design, one wasn’t 2-story, they were both traditional 13 <br />ranch buildings. 14 <br /> 15 <br />John Price: You’re talking about the similarity between the other properties in your analysis, you’re 16 <br />not talking about similarity to the property contiguous to the cell tower, correct? 17 <br /> 18 <br />David Smith: That’s correct. These are two properties that were in different areas, correct. 19 <br /> 20 <br />John Price: No further questions. 21 <br /> 22 <br />Samantha Cabe: Do any members of the Board have questions for this witness? 23 <br /> 24 <br />Barry Katz: You were talking about properties on Sunrise, right? Is Sunrise in a rural buffer? 25 <br /> 26 <br />Michael Harvey: Yes. 27 <br /> 28 <br />John Price: Sunrise or Sunset? You said in your report Sunset, I thought? 29 <br /> 30 <br />David Smith: Sunrise. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Barry Katz: It is in a rural buffer. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Michael Harvey: I’m going to answer that questions following that it is. A telecommunications 35 <br />tower that was reviewed in 2004 and 2005 when my tenure with the County started on Sunrise 36 <br />Road. And it is in the rural buffer. It’s on the outskirts of Chapel Hill. 37 <br />36