BOA agenda 031317 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

DRAFT OC Board of Adjustment – 11/9/15 Page 1 of 156 MINUTES 1 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 2 DATE DECEMBER 12, 2016 3 REGULAR MEETING 4 5 MEMBERS PRESENT: Samantha Cabe (Chair) 6 Karen Barrows (Vice-Chair) 7 Matt Hughes 8 Barry Katz 9 Susan Halkiotis 10 11 STAFF PRESENT: Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor 12 Patrick Mallet, Planner II 13 Elaina Cheek, Board Secretary 14 James Bryan, Staff Attorney 15 Anne Marie Tosco, Staff Attorney 16 17 AGENDA ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER 18 19 Samantha Cabe called the meeting to order. 20 21 AGENDA ITEM 2: CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONS TO AGENDA 22 There were no additions to the agenda. 23 24 AGENDA ITEM 3: APPROVAL OF MINUTES-OCTOBER 10, 2016 AND OCTOBER 24, 2016 REGULAR MEETING 25 26 Samantha Cabe requested that the Minutes reflect that rather than absent she was recused for conflict. Karen Barrows 27 noted that on page 102, line 45 it was herself that had asked that question. 28 29 MOTION to approve Minutes as modified made by Susan Halkiotis. Seconded by Karen Barrows. 30 VOTE: Unanimous 31 32 33 AGENDA ITEM 4: PUBLIC CHARGE 34 Karen Barrows read the public charge 35 36 The Board of Adjustment pledges to the citizens of Orange County its respect. The Board asks its citizens to conduct 37 themselves in a respectful, courteous manner, both with the Board and with fellow citizens. At any time should any 38 member of the Board or any citizen fail to observe this public charge, the Chair will ask the offending person to leave the 39 meeting until that individual regains personal control. Should decorum fail to be restored, the Chair will recess the meeting 40 until such time that a genuine commitment to this public charge is observed. All electronic devices such as cell phones, 41 pagers, and computers should please be turned off or set to silent/vibrate. 42 43 The Board of Adjustment is a quasi-judicial administrative body established in accordance with the provisions of local 44 regulations and State law to perform specified functions essential to the County’s planning program. Action(s) taken by the 45 board are based solely on competent, substantial, and material evidence presented during a previously scheduled and 46 advertised public hearing on a specific item. As detailed within Section 2.12.2 of the UDO the Board chair reserves the 47 right to exclude evidence and testimony that is deemed: ‘incompetent, irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious’ and 48 therefore fails to reasonably address the issues before the Board of Adjustment. While it should be noted there is no time 49 3