BOA agenda 031317 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

DRAFT OC Board of Adjustment – 11/9/15 Page 156 of 156 these regulations or the Comprehensive Plan or portion thereof adopted by the BOCC. That 1 finding would be based upon the evidence submitted in the application package, including 2 Narrative at tab 1, the impact analysis in tab 32, the site plan at tab 8, the balloon test results at 3 abstract attachment 5, as well as the fact that the prima facie case has been established for the 4 use being in harmony and there’s not been sufficient evidence to refute that prima facie case. And 5 that the Applicant has met this burden. Seconded by Matt Hughes. 6 7 VOTE: Unanimous. 8 9 Samantha Cabe: So the Staff is recommending that the ultimate issuance of the Unified 10 Development Ordinance be subject to conditions that are set forth on pages 162 and 163 of the 11 packet. Any Discussion? 12 13 Barry Katz: Didn’t the applicant disagree with one of these …… 14 15 Matt Hughes: The buffer condition about trees ….. 16 17 Samantha Cabe: I think we have the ability to modify or not. Having said that I think we have 18 recommendations from staff and I am not sure I have heard compelling reasons to deviate ….. 19 20 Barry Katz: Yeah but can we really … I mean the buffer standard is what the Ordinance says. 21 Susan Halkiotis: I think the conditions are reasonable. 22 23 Matt Hughes: I ….. hang on …. I think the conditions address some of the concerns we have 24 heard. 25 26 Samantha Cabe: Do I have a motion? 27 28 Motion made by Barry Katz to approve the permit and impose the conditions recommended by 29 staff. Seconded by Matt Hughes. 30 31 VOTE: Unanimous. 32 33 34 AGENDA ITEM : ADJOURNMENT: 35 36 MOTION by Barry Katz to adjourn. Seconded by Susan Halkiotis 37 38 VOTE: UNANIMOUS 39 40 41 _________________________________________ 42 NAME OF CHAIR, CHAIR 43 158