Browse
Search
BOA agenda 031317
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Agendas
>
2017
>
BOA agenda 031317
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2018 4:35:07 PM
Creation date
3/6/2018 4:26:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/13/2017
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
BOA minutes 031317
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Board of Adjustment\Minutes\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br /> <br />OC Board of Adjustment – 11/9/15 Page 120 of 156 <br /> <br />Laura Goode: Absolutely, so the maps we provided. But those circles were not placed on those 1 <br />maps by Verizon. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Ben Levitan: No, I apologize. Everything in color was what came out of the application. The circles 4 <br />and explanations I did put there myself and I do apologize for not explaining that but I did that, you 5 <br />understand why I did that. 6 <br /> 7 <br />Laura Goode: I don’t have any further questions. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Barry Katz: I have a question. TowerCom and Verizon are two separate businesses, correct? 10 <br /> 11 <br />Laura Goode: Correct. TowerCom is a tower building company and so they’re building it to 12 <br />Verizon’s needs. 13 <br /> 14 <br />Barry Katz: Right, so you contracted TowerCom to build yours? 15 <br /> 16 <br />Laura Goode: Correct. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Barry Katz: Before I came to this meeting one of the questions that I had in my mind, not knowing 19 <br />an answer at all, was were there alternatives to building this 199-foot tower that would be 20 <br />effective? What we’re hearing is that Verizon has considered this kind of question in way in a 21 <br />different context for other purposes and everything and it may be apples and oranges, I don’t 22 <br />know. But, do you have a witness or somebody that could explain to us why, in this circumstance, 23 <br />putting this tower in would be better than existing alternatives that would not require this 24 <br />approach? 25 <br /> 26 <br />Laura Goode: Sure, so I think there’s two ways to answer that question. Yes, we do have a 27 <br />witness and I can call him right now. But it’s a little bit… If you want to hear it, that’s what I’m 28 <br />hearing from you and we can just address it in a couple short questions if that’s what you would 29 <br />like to hear, but in terms of looking at other structures within the search area North Carolina 30 <br />General Statutes says that the applicant only has to prove an inability to co-locate within their 31 <br />search area, which is identified in Exhibit 5, or tab 5 of the application. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Samantha Cabe: And what does that Statute reference, do you have that? 34 <br /> 35 <br />Laura Goode: Sure, it is… yes, I have it right here. That is North Carolina General Statutes 153A-36 <br />349.52 and we have provided an inability to co-locate statement because the first thing that 37 <br />Verizon tries to do when they have a search ring, they want to go out and find an existing 38 <br />structure, like a water tower, a building, anything that they can co-locate on because it is so much 39 <br />less expensive and so less time consuming to co-locate. And so there is a signed statement from 40 <br />John Yeagley, who testified at the last hearing about this. His statement, his inability co-locate 41 <br />statement is tab 21 and he testified to the fact that he went out in that search area and there were 42 <br />no structures within the search area to co-locate. Now, in terms of your second question, we do 43 <br />have a witness who could explain why small cells or other technologies would not work for this 44 <br />network agenda. 45 <br /> 46 <br />Barry Katz: Is this germane? Am I asking a question that’s pertinent to this because what I just 47 <br />heard was we’re talking about within that circle and everything and the Statute says such and 48 <br />such and it may not be even relevant. 49 <br /> 50 <br />122
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.