BOA agenda 031317 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

DRAFT OC Board of Adjustment – 11/9/15 Page 108 of 156 Ben Levitan: This is from the application. Ok, and the left is the before of the existing condition 1 and the right is what improvement the tower is going to provide. You can see the yellow line on 2 the left chart, that’s Mount Carmel Church Road. And you can see red is really good coverage, 3 green is pretty good coverage, blue and gray that’s pretty spotty coverage. That certainly could 4 use some improvement. Alright now, on that same chart look, there’s another road to the left, just 5 a black line. That’s 15-501. You can see when you’re driving off 15-501 that’s pretty good 6 coverage up and down that road. Ok so, this is what’s existing. Go to the right side of the page 7 and what you can see is this is what’s going to change. Alright, look at the yellow line. We would 8 like that yellow line, we would like the coverage to look like it does on 15-501. We still have major 9 gaps. This new cell tower that’s been added here provides so good coverage right around the 10 tower itself, but you’re driving along Mount Carmel Church Road and you’ve still got big gaps in 11 service. It’s not fulfilling the goal. The way to fulfill the goal here would be to put three 27-50-foot 12 towers along this road. Especially where that big blue gap is and that would solve the problem 13 from Mount Carmel Church Road. This tower’s obviously not solving the problem. You can see 14 right from their own propagation survey. You’re in that spot with still that power. Ok so that’s the 15 number one reason I don’t think this tower fulfills goal number one. Let’s go to goal number two: 16 offload UNC’s cell tower. Ok look at the coverage on the left side. We’ve got this valley of 17 coverage pretty much where Mount Carmel Church Road still is. You can see south of the UNC 18 Campus it’s blue, it’s gray, it’s light blue. Kind of poor coverage there. Look at the right. You still 19 have that valley of coverage. You basically… you can see the lower, you can see where the UNC 20 Campus coverage starts in green. That does not change substantially. I mean, this is a big 21 investment. Putting up a cell tower is a million bucks and it’s going to be $20,000-$30,000 a year 22 to maintain. About $20,000 on leases and electricity is what? $500 a month, by itself. Broadband 23 is going to be about $1,500 a year. If you’re going to invest in coverage you’re going to make sure 24 it actually fulfills the goal. It does not fulfill either of these goals, and that’s my argument here. 25 26 John Price: (Inaudible) 27 28 Ben Levitan: Ok. So that’s… I can stop there. And those are my two major points I want to bring 29 out. The technical design to solve these problems is completely different than what’s being 30 proposed. 31 32 John Price: Which brings me to my next question, which is in this letter of August 11, 2016, again, 33 Exhibit 4 to the application. Mr. Haughney states, “There are no alternative technologies available 34 which could provide the needed increase to coverage and capacity offload in the Clearwater Lake 35 area without the proposed new telecommunication tower”. Do you agree? 36 37 Ben Levitan: It’s absolutely wrong. That’s incorrect. You can see from this that it does not solve 38 the problem. The alternatives, I’ve already stated: For UNC I would put small cells or enhanced 39 coverage within the campus, and for Mount Carmel Church Road you want smaller, targeted cell 40 towers. Cell towers, like I said, is like a radio station. Normally they put up the cell tower and it 41 provides coverage in a circular area around it. So on highways where you have specific problems, 42 like I-40, any highway, you don’t make a circular cell tower. You put up a cell tower and you focus 43 it to go up and down the road because that’s where you need the coverage. If you’ve got a lawn 44 sprinkler at home you understand this, you’ve got that strip at the front of your house that you 45 want to cover. You don’t put a circular sprinkler on that because that water’s going to mostly go 46 out in the street. On that strip you point these little sprinklers that point left and right that are going 47 to cover just the strip. So what’s really needed for Mount Carmel Church Road is maybe one or 48 two smaller cell towers. I’d say 27-foot to 50-foot maximum and they can be stealth that are just 49 pointed straight up and down that road to provide focused coverage on that. On top of that can be 50 110