Orange County NC Website
cannot rely alone on whether there's farming activity going on, but is the use that is proposed for a non-1 <br />farm purpose? I've provided you several cases. I'm going to talk about a few of them here. One of them I'd 2 <br />like to point out now is the case called Ball B. Rooter, Randolph County, in your materials. In the Ball case 3 <br />the person who own the property was using farm equipment to till petroleum-contaminated soil. And the 4 <br />court looked at that and said, well you know there's a farm there and that's where equipment and it's 5 <br />making some money for the farm, but it is a non-farm used because it was really soil remediation. It was 6 <br />not farming. What the ball case tells us is twofold. Number one is just because it is happening on the farm 7 <br />does not mean that it is a farm purpose. And number two, the courts have demonstrated that we need to 8 <br />look behind the use to be sure that the use is not a use for a non-farm purpose. That then causes you to 9 <br />ask the question of what is a farm purpose? You look at 150a-340 and it talks about activities related to and 10 <br />incidental to the production of agricultural products. Is the activity related to and incidental to production of 11 <br />agricultural products? This statute then incorporates the definition of agricultural in NCGS 106-581.1. I've 12 <br />given you a copy of that as well. That statute makes clear it has a litany of things that constitute farm 13 <br />purposes. But if you read it all the way through that statute also says those things are farm purposes when 14 <br />they are related to or incidental to a bona fide farm purpose. One of those things is agritourism. What does 15 <br />it mean to be related to or incidental to? Well the dictionary definition, which you use of your capacity as 16 <br />interpreters of this statute, is it happens as a minor part or as a result of something else. So in the context 17 <br />of the statute the activity that is claimed to be exempt must be a minor part. Let me say that again. It must 18 <br />be a minor part or directly related to the exempt farm purpose. If not it falls under the zoning regulations. It 19 <br />falls under the zoning regulations that an event center in Orange County in the AR zone must have the 20 <br />special use permit. You will recall just a moment ago facts not listed in my findings of facts that I had asked 21 <br />Ms. Brewer on the 10th how many square feet of this 4,600 and some odd square foot structure were 22 <br />needed to store any of her farm products and in your findings of fact indicate that she couldn't answer that 23 <br />question as to flowers, or as to chestnut flour, or chestnuts. She couldn't answer as to equipment. She 24 <br />couldn't tell us what she was going to do with the equipment and the flour in order to keep her promise to 25 <br />brides that she had a full run of the farm. Mr. Brewer tonight answered the question about the machine. Let 26 <br />me go back to my note. He indicated that the machine that we need to do store in this 4600 square foot 27 <br />barn would be possibly 5 feet by 5 feet. Just going to stick in the kitchen. With the caterers. Who may or 28 <br />may not be in the kitchen. A 4,600 square foot barn, with a septic system designed to accommodate 250 29 <br />people 3 days a week, with a parking lot designed to accommodate 125 cars, with a service entrance 30 <br />identified in the plans for things like caterers and florists is not a barn that was built for farm purposes. 31 <br />We’re not going to clean out the barn and have an occasional wedding. We're going to clean out the farm 32 <br />all the time to have a wedding event center. It is not incidental. A couple of the other cases I’ve included in 33 <br />your packet; there’s a case called County of Durham V Robert. This case is instructed as is the next one 34 <br />I’m going to speak about because in County of Durham V Roberts there was a one time sale of excavated 35 <br />soil incidental to improving pasture land and expanding the farm. This is somebody who had a horse farm. 36 <br />They flattened it, they dug the pond, and they took the dirt, and they sold it. The Durham County said, 37 <br />“Well, wait a minute. You’re selling dirt, that’s not farming”. That’s incidental. That was a one-time thing; you 38 <br />sold it. That’s what incidental means. It makes sense. It makes common sense. North inaudible County 39 <br />neighbors for a rural life inaudible County is the other side of the corn. There, we have a biodiesel 40 <br />production operation. The courts said no. Even if you’re using farm equipment to do that that is an industrial 41 <br />use. I think you were handed, and I have included in your packet, was a copy of NCGS I9e-30 and 31. 42 <br />That’s not a statute that is cited in 153a. It’s not the statute that the legislature sent you back to find the 43 <br />definition of agritourism or farming or anything else. What that statute is is part of the legislation. There’s a 44 <br />section in the statutes for special liability protection. And one of the special liability protections that is 45 <br />offered in North Carolina is a special liability protection for agritourism. And so that statute has been 46 <br />provided to you to say, “Look, see”. Agritourism is a kind of farming. Well let’s look at that statute more 47 <br />carefully. It defines agritourism as any activity carried out on a farm or ranch that allowed members of the 48 <br />91