Browse
Search
BOA agenda 121216
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Agendas
>
2016
>
BOA agenda 121216
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2018 4:24:58 PM
Creation date
3/6/2018 4:15:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/12/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
BOA minutes 121216
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Board of Adjustment\Minutes\2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
211
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />Andy Petesch: And so your report accurately reflects and is consistent with your positions before the Board 2 <br />on October 10, 2016? 3 <br /> 4 <br />Erin White: That’s correct. 5 <br /> 6 <br />LeAnne Brown: For the record, I object to your receipt of the report. This is the first time I have been 7 <br />handed a copy. I do not have an opportunity to read it and cross-examine the witness, and I renew my 8 <br />objection to your considering him as an expert. If you’re going to read and consider this in your 9 <br />deliberations I’m going to need time to read it and be able to determine whether I should cross-examine 10 <br />him on it. And as I said in the last hearing I question whether he’s an expert. So I’d like to lodge those 11 <br />objections for your record. And I apologize again for being so formal. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Andy Petesch: This is marked as SPG exhibit 24. And I would simply note that if this report had been 14 <br />provided at the October 10th that Ms. Brown would be in the same position. 15 <br /> 16 <br />LeAnne Brown: I’d have had 2 weeks to read it if I had had a copy of it on the 10th. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Andy Petesch: If you could provide a 2mintue overview of your report? 19 <br /> 20 <br />Erin White: Sure. Thanks for your time tonight. It just goes over again my qualifications and experience, 21 <br />describes the process that I went through in reviewing the farm plan materials. I reviewed the multi-factor 22 <br />analysis that I looked at so really coming at this farm from a number of directions looking at key issues 23 <br />clear to evaluate agreement and consistency between the proposed project and the goals, definitions, and 24 <br />practice of agriculture and agritourism. I looked at the importance of Agriculture to Orange County. I looked 25 <br />at common challenges to agriculture both the Orange County and North Carolina. I looked at the role 26 <br />agritourism, of reaching the larger agricultural roles of new farm development, farm profitability, and public 27 <br />support for rural land preservation. And then more specifically this project classifying as a farm or not is a 28 <br />key question and that classifying each activity proposed in the project as to whether it agrees or not with 29 <br />North Carolina definition of agriculture and agritourism. So, without getting into too much of the detail, 30 <br />Orange County has pretty high priority stated through planning documents, the comprehensive plan, and 31 <br />the agriculture economic plan. High priority on agriculture as a sector. Common challenges to agriculture 32 <br />include age land use patterns especially those residential developments a cultural shift away from farming 33 <br />so in order to replace Farmers that are aging out we don't have younger and new farmers moving in. A 34 <br />globalized food system is creating a really difficult and competitive situation for local and small farms. They 35 <br />can't just compete on price. They have to come up with other activities to help them compete. To explore 36 <br />the role of agritourism and the importance of agritourism to meet these challenges. And then classifying the 37 <br />Brewers’ project as a farm; reviewing the farm business plan summary, conducting a site visit, meeting with 38 <br />the Brewers, and really finding that in fact it is a farm. There is agriculture activity in the ground, the plan is 39 <br />consistent with food production, with commercial horticulture, and the fact that they've met the regulatory 40 <br />requirements by 3 different regulatory bodies are to become a bona fide Farm. It seems to me that, in fact, 41 <br />yes they are farm. And then looking at each of 15 activities that are proposed both in the farm plan 42 <br />summary in the building permit application and in the bona fide farm exemption affidavit. 15 different 43 <br />activities that are proposed for the site examining, all of them through the definition of agriculture, and that's 44 <br />using General Statutes, and sub to that the definition of agritourism also in the general statute. And really 45 <br />looking at them carefully found that each of them actually fit the definition of agritourism and agriculture. 46 <br />And both the definitions per se and the commonly understood activities of agritourism certainly include 47 <br />these activities so the report concludes with my own opinion based on my experience and training and 48 <br />85
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.