Browse
Search
BOA agenda 121216
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Agendas
>
2016
>
BOA agenda 121216
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2018 4:24:58 PM
Creation date
3/6/2018 4:15:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/12/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
BOA minutes 121216
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Board of Adjustment\Minutes\2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
211
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
through the process of putting that evidence on before you and then move from that evidence into the case 1 <br />in chief. 2 <br /> 3 <br />James Bryan: Madame Chair, if I could interject here just for the clarity of this case, I think it’d be best to 4 <br />understand exactly what is under appeal, what is the issue of the appeal. I was a bit confused whether… I 5 <br />heard septic permits as well so perhaps LeAnne Brown if you could restate… 6 <br /> 7 <br />LeAnne Brown: It’s our contention that in order to proceed with the development of this property the 8 <br />property owner is required to have a SUP, which was denied, and so the determination by the County Staff 9 <br />that no permits were required because of the farm use is the decision under appeal. The building permit is 10 <br />the obvious permit that goes first but what followed from that was the ability to do the septic permit and 11 <br />otherwise but the appeal is of the grant of the building permit. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Karen Barrows: Does that answer your concern, James? 14 <br /> 15 <br />James Bryan: If I could just restate it. The determination by Staff that no SUP was required for the building 16 <br />permit. 17 <br /> 18 <br />LeAnne Brown: Or stated another way that the plans as proposed were exempt from the Orange County 19 <br />Zoning Ordinance. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Barry Katz: Because… 22 <br /> 23 <br />LeAnne Brown: Because of the determination by the Staff that under 153a-340 the County didn’t have 24 <br />zoning jurisdiction over the use because of the farm. 25 <br /> 26 <br />Barry Katz: For farm uses? 27 <br /> 28 <br />LeAnne Brown: Yes, sir. It’s our contention that the use as proposed is a non-farm use and therefore if it’s a 29 <br />non-farm use the County Zoning Ordinance applies. So I think we’re saying the same thing in three distinct 30 <br />ways. When the building permit application was filed we believe it should have been rejected by the 31 <br />County, however way you want to… 32 <br /> 33 <br />James Bryan: And that’s important. There’s two other elements: who and when? So, I think the Board 34 <br />should clarify, when it’s Staff, who exactly that Staff is and when that determination was made. 35 <br /> 36 <br />LeAnne Brown: The decision that we appeal before this Board is the decision, that of Mr. Harvey, that no 37 <br />permit was required and the appeal was required within 30 days of his notice to me that he had made that 38 <br />decision. 39 <br /> 40 <br />James Bryan: So if I could advise the Board; there is a very base of appeal and usually for a permit it is to 41 <br />the property owner, there is some written piece of paper and it’s when they receive that. For other people, 42 <br />other parties, it’s when they receive actual notice of it. It’s still important to understand when the actual 43 <br />determination was made. 44 <br /> 45 <br />Barry Katz: Alright, I’ve got a question. There was a determination made that this was agricultural property 46 <br />and had good justification. Presumably for making that determination that this was qualified as a farm, 47 <br />right? That was one, and then the other thing was the application for the building permit was the second 48 <br />8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.