Browse
Search
BOA agenda 121216
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Agendas
>
2016
>
BOA agenda 121216
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2018 4:24:58 PM
Creation date
3/6/2018 4:15:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/12/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
BOA minutes 121216
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Board of Adjustment\Minutes\2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
211
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
scheduled and advertised public hearing on a specific item. As detailed within Section 2.12.2 of the UDO the Board 1 <br />chair reserves the right to exclude evidence and testimony that is deemed: ‘incompetent, irrelevant, immaterial, or 2 <br />unduly repetitious’ and therefore fails to reasonably address the issues before the Board of Adjustment. While it 3 <br />should be noted there is no time limit on the presentation of evidence, the Chair asks that the presentation of 4 <br />evidence be consistent with established policies, rules of procedure, and acceptable levels of decorum to ensure a 5 <br />fair and equitable hearing for all parties. 6 <br /> 7 AGENDA ITEM 5: A-1-16 – APPEAL OF A DECISION CONCERNING A PARCEL OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE 8 <br />INTERSECTION OF MORROW MILL AND MILLIKAN ROADS (PIN: 9729-50-7168) 9 <br /> 10 <br />In accordance with the provisions of Sections 2.11 and 2.26 of the Orange County Unified Development 11 <br />Ordinance (UDO) the applicants have appealed a decision of the Zoning Officer, as articulated within a May 12 <br />18, 2016 e-mail, related to the processing of a building permit for a parcel of property identified utilizing 13 <br />Orange County Parcel Identification Number (PIN) 9729-50-7168 owned by Southeast Property Group LLC 14 <br />care of Ms. Kara Brewer. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Specifically the applicants allege staff erred by not requiring zoning approval for said permit. 17 <br /> 18 <br /> Karen Barrows: So we have before us tonight an appeal. We usually have Staff present first. 19 <br /> 20 <br />James Bryan: Madame Chair, if you don’t mind, can I make a preliminary statement? 21 <br /> 22 <br />Karen Barrows: You can, sure. 23 <br /> 24 <br />James Bryan: This is mostly because we have uncommon circumstances here. First, with a full room and 25 <br />also most members of this Board have not had an appeal before them, so I want to go over the general 26 <br />process. So this is a hearing before the Board of Adjustment so it’s open to the public meaning that 27 <br />everyone is welcome to watch. It is also quasi-judicial in nature. Quasi-judicial means that it is like a court 28 <br />of law, there are rules as to what this Board this Board may or may not consider. When there are questions 29 <br />about those rules I’ll try my best to advise the Board so they may act according to the authorities granted to 30 <br />them by statute. This is also an appeal, which is different than most matters before this Board. It may be 31 <br />new to several members of the Board. There may be questions about standing, jurisdiction, sufficiency of 32 <br />evidence, rules of interpretation, methods of establishing the record, and making the ultimate decision to 33 <br />affirm, modify, or reverse Staff’s decision. I’m here to advise the Board and prohibited from giving advice to 34 <br />the public. Full participation in this hearing is limited only to the parties. The parties may include the County, 35 <br />the property owner, and those with special damages. That participation includes making legal arguments, 36 <br />introducing evidence, like calling witnesses and cross-examination. This Board has limited jurisdiction. It 37 <br />may not make advisory opinions but instead is limited to reviewing only the final and finding determinations 38 <br />of Staff. It may not consider appeals after certain time limitations. Evidence is limited as well; it can only be 39 <br />introduced by parties. The Board may only base its decisions on competent material and substantial 40 <br />evidence. The decision will be made by majority vote including findings of fact and followed by the Chair 41 <br />signing a written decision. There has been a sign-in sheet for those wishing to identify as either speakers or 42 <br />parties. Parties will have to demonstrate that they suffer special damages. Speakers may be called by the 43 <br />Board as the Board’s witnesses if the Board decides further testimony on facts in question. If there are no 44 <br />facts in question, as to say they’re only questions of law rather than fact, then the Board will not call any 45 <br />witnesses. 46 <br /> 47 <br />Karen Barrows: Thanks James. Any questions before we begin? … Ok. 48 <br /> 49 <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.