BOA agenda 121216 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Karen Barrows: It seems to me that Ordinance to allow agritourism, inaudible to me, it means places like 1 Maple View and stuff like that. It gives them an opportunity to diversify it but this is not that. 2 3 Barry Katz: Then, near the end. The appellants. Fair use of their property. They also have a right to fair use 4 of their property and they basically testified that the use of their property is interfered with by the activities 5 that would happen related to the events. And their fair use is a valid point on this. 6 7 Susan Halkiotis: So is this a motion where you’re saying that all of these are findings of fact? 8 9 Barry Katz: I’m pointing to these findings as suggested by our attorney because going forward there will be 10 some relevance to these findings in future activity related to this. 11 12 James Bryan: Yeah, and as a reminder this is going to be reduced to writing and the Chair has to sign it. So 13 if you could, if you were going by this, list numbers for the secretary to jot down. That might be easier. 14 Barry Katz: Let’s call out the numbers. Did you say 4? 15 16 Karen Barrows: I said 4. 17 18 Barry Katz: 4. I’m sorry, I have to go through all of this again to make any kind of sense of what I… 19 20 Susan Halkiotis: Well 11 and 12. 21 22 Barry Katz: Yeah, 11 and 12. 13. This is essentially the same building so that would be 14 and 15. The 23 whole traffic analysis, etcetera, DOT, the driveway, all of this is related to the events, 19. 24 25 Susan Halkiotis: It might be easier to see if there are any you want to exclude. 26 27 Barry Katz: Well I don’t know about that. Well I would put in 24. Yeah, well 25. And 26, 27, 28, and 29 28 relates the wastewater treatment, which again speaks to the fact that this is reiteration of the plan that we 29 saw last year. I would put in 35 because this is where the testimony of Ms. Brewer comes in, as far as the 30 intent of what it is that she had in mind all the time that she was developing this plan. 31 32 Karen Barrows: Do you have an issue with 49? 33 34 Barry Katz: Well I mentioned 49, that’s true. 35 36 Susan Halkiotis: 46 and 47? 37 38 Barry Katz: 46, and 47. And then we get to the appellants. I would certainly include 56, 57, 58, as it relates 39 to the fact that they also have rights to their property, their agricultural property. And whether the purported 40 use would interfere with their rights. 41 42 Karen Barrows: We’re here to entertain a motion. Matt did you have anything? 43 44 Barry Katz: I move that we adopt the ruling number 2 that reverses the decision and as it states there, do I 45 have this right? Orange County Planning Director or the designee shall review the building permit 46 application, make a determination as to whether the structure identified will be used for a bona fide farm 47 purpose and whether the use as a wedding and event center is related to or incidental to such bona fide 48 114