Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
1 <br />REQUIREMENT UDO SUPPORTING EVIDENCE Staff BOA <br />STANDARDS for Telecommunication Facilities (continued) <br /> <br />Draft bond guaranteeing removal of <br />the wireless support structure in the <br />event that it is abandoned or <br />unused for a period of 12 months. <br /> <br />5.8.10 (B) <br />(3) (f) <br /> <br />Staff is recommending a finding that <br />this provision is not applicable as <br />the proposal does not invalidate the <br />existing removal bond for the facility <br />N/A N/A <br /> <br />A listing of, and current tax map <br />identifying, all property owners <br />within 1,000 feet of the parcel <br /> <br />5.8.10 (B) <br />(3) (g) <br /> <br />Application (Attachment 2) Yes Yes <br /> <br />A report containing any comments <br />received by the applicant in <br />response to the balloon test along <br />with color photographs from various <br />locations around the balloon. <br /> <br />5.8.10 (B) <br />(3) (h) <br /> <br />Staff is recommending a finding that <br />this provision is not applicable as no <br />balloon test was done or required <br />for this project as the request did not <br />involve any alteration (i.e. increasing <br />height) of the existing, approved, <br />tower or propose a ‘new wireless <br />support structure’ <br />. <br />N/A N/A <br /> <br />Evidence that the balloon test <br />requirement has been met. <br /> <br />5.8.10 (B) <br />(3) (i) <br /> <br />Staff is recommending a finding that <br />this provision is not applicable as no <br />balloon test was done or required to <br />allow for the re-location of the <br />existing driveway. <br /> <br />A balloon test was not required as <br />the application did not proposed a <br />‘new wireless support structure’ as <br />detailed in Section 5.8.10 (B) (2) of <br />the UDO. <br /> <br />N/A N/A <br /> <br />A notarized statement that the sign <br />posting requirement has been met. <br /> <br />5.8.10 (B) <br />(3) (j) <br />Staff is recommending a finding that <br />this provision is not applicable as no <br />balloon test was done or required <br />for the project given the fact the <br />erection of a tower was not part of <br />the request. <br /> <br />A balloon test was not required as <br />the application did not proposed a <br />‘new wireless support structure’ as <br />detailed in Section 5.8.10 (B) (2) of <br />the UDO. <br /> <br />N/A N/A <br /> <br />Photographs of a clearly visible <br />balloon floated at the proposed <br />tower location as well as <br />photographs with the proposed <br />tower and associated antennas <br />5.8.10 (B) <br />(3) (k) <br /> <br />Staff is recommending a finding that <br />this provision is not applicable as no <br />balloon test was done or required <br />for the project. <br /> <br />A balloon test was not required as <br />N/A N/A <br />56