BOA agenda 101016 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Halkiotis. 1 VOTE: Unanimous 2 3 Samantha Cabe: Page 133, the 2 findings there; the recommended findings of staff are yes, there’s no 4 conflict that I noted. Is there a motion with regard to 1 or both those findings? 5 6 MOTION made by Susan Halkiotis to adopt findings recommended by staff on page 132. Seconded by 7 Karen Barrows. 8 VOTE: Unanimous 9 10 Samantha Cabe: Page 134, there are 5 findings there. I have in my notes that the fourth finding staff 11 recommended changing that to a finding of yes based on evidence of the existing bond in place. And that 12 modification to staff recommendation was from Mr. Harvey’s testimony. Do I have a motion with regard to 13 those findings? 14 15 Barry Katz: I move to adopt them with the change that the fourth item, 5.10.8 B5 be changed to a yes. 16 17 MOTION made by Barry Katz. Seconded by Susan Halkiotis. 18 VOTE: Unanimous 19 20 Samantha Cabe: The recommendations of staff set forth on page 134 is modified by testimony or adopted 21 by the Board… Page 135, we will go through these separately. The first finding that we must make is that 22 the use will or will not maintain or promote the public health, safety, and general welfare if located where 23 proposed and developed and operated according to the plan as submitted. 24 25 Barry Katz: I have a question. Do we have to do anything about these recommendations before we finish 26 page 135 or can we do it after? 27 28 Samantha Cabe: It’s my understanding that we make these findings and then before we make the ultimate 29 decision to approve the permit, we make a motion to approve would be conditions. So we can go through 30 these findings first. 31 32 Barry Katz: Well, I move that we accept the applicants application for section 5.3.2 A to A. That first one, as 33 far as maintain/promote the public health and safety. 34 35 MOTION made by Barry Katz. Seconded by Susan Halkiotis. 36 VOTE: Unanimous 37 38 Samantha Cabe: With regard to the second finding, do I have a motion? 39 40 Karen Barrows: I’ll make a motion that the use will maintain or enhance the value of the contiguous 41 property. 42 43 MOTION made by Karen Barrows. Seconded by Barry Katz. 44 VOTE: Unanimous 45 46 Samantha Cabe: And the third finding that we’re required to make that the location and character of the 47 use, if developed according to the plan submitted, will or will not be in harmony with the area in which it is 48 to be located, and the use is in compliance with the plan for the physical development of the County as 49 34