BOA agenda 101016 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

are staff recommendations that there is no conflict between staff and legal counsel. Do I have a motion with 1 regard to all the findings set forth on pages 123 through 128 of attachment 4? 2 3 MOTION made by Susan Halkiotis to adopt findings recommended by staff on pages 123 through 128. 4 Seconded by Barry Katz. 5 VOTE: Unanimous 6 7 Samantha Cabe: Thank you Mr. Bryan. Beginning on page 129 there are 3 findings of fact with the first 8 being non applicable and you may recall that the applicant did present testimony that utilities provided to 9 the site will be underground. Do I have a motion with regard to 1 or all of the findings on that page? 10 11 Karen Barrows: I’ll make a motion that we accept these items with the staff recommendations. 12 13 Samantha Cabe: I have a friendly amendment to that. I would ask that you amend your motion to include 14 modifying the finding with regard to the first finding of fact on page 129 that the finding of yes, based upon 15 the applicant testimony that utilities be installed underground. 16 17 Karen Barrows: Ok, so I will modify the motion to say that all 3 of these have a yes. 18 19 MOTION made by Karen Barrows to make a finding of yes for the findings on page 129. Seconded by 20 Susan Halkiotis. 21 VOTE: Unanimous 22 23 Samantha Cabe: Page 130, there are 2 findings of fact and I do not believe there are conflicts between 24 legal counsel and staff. Do I have a motion with regard to those findings? 25 26 MOTION made by Barry Katz to adopt findings recommended by staff on page 130. Seconded by Susan 27 Halkiotis. 28 VOTE: Unanimous 29 30 Samantha Cabe: Page 131, the 2 findings of fact. The 2 findings set forth there, there’s no conflict between 31 staff and legal counsel. Do I have a motion with regard to those findings? 32 33 MOTION made by Karen Barrows to adopt findings recommended by staff on page 131. Seconded by 34 Barry Katz. 35 VOTE: Unanimous 36 37 Samantha Cabe: On page 132, there are 3 findings. The finding regarding lighting there is some difference 38 of opinion. The opinion of staff is that the ordinance reads that if lighting is required or proposed that these 39 submissions are required and it’s staffs position that the lighting is not proposed or required with this 40 project, so they have recommended a finding of non-applicable. Do I have a motion with regard to 1 or all of 41 the findings on this page? 42 43 Barry Katz: Now, the counsel recommended something different? 44 45 Samantha Cabe: I believe I had noted that counsel believed that there needed to be something submitted 46 with regard to lighting. 47 48 MOTION made by Barry Katz to adopt findings recommended by staff on page 132. Seconded by Susan 49 33