Orange County NC Website
deliberations. 1 <br /> 2 <br />MOTION made by Susan Halkiotis. Seconded by Matt Hughes. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Samantha Cabe: So the meeting is now closed and the BOA will begin deliberations. My suggestion to the 5 <br />Board would be that we go through the different sections of the staff recommendations because there are 6 <br />some sections where we can do as we usually do and adopt the recommendations because there’s no 7 <br />conflict. When we get to the sections where there are conflict my recommendation is I have noted where 8 <br />there’s conflict and we can talk about those individually and resolve those and then vote on the section as a 9 <br />whole. If that is.. once we resolve those conflicts we can vote on the whole section. Does that make sense 10 <br />to everyone, if I proceed that way? Does anyone have any objections to that? 11 <br /> 12 <br />Ok so, the first section would be the application components which are reflected on page 105 and I do not 13 <br />believe there was any conflict among staff and legal counsel as to any of these findings. Does anyone want 14 <br />to discuss any of these findings? And if not, do I have a motion to approve to adopt the findings of staff with 15 <br />regard to the application components that are set forth on page 105 of the attachment 4? 16 <br /> 17 <br />MOTION made by Barry Katz to adopt the application components. Seconded by Susan Halkiotis. 18 <br />VOTE: Unanimous 19 <br /> 20 <br />Samantha Cabe: The second section is reflected on page 106, are the notification requirements. Again, this 21 <br />is a section where there was no dispute between staff and legal counsel. Do I have a motion to adopt the 22 <br />recommendation of staff with regard to those findings? 23 <br /> 24 <br />MOTION made by Matt Hughes to adopt the recommendation of staff on page 106. Seconded by Karen 25 <br />Barrows. 26 <br />VOTE: Unanimous 27 <br /> 28 <br />Samantha Cabe: Moving on to page 107 we get into the specific standard section. The first page of the 29 <br />specific standards are specific standards in general and not specific to telecommunication facilities, which 30 <br />are set forth in section 5.3.2. I do not believe there was any dispute between staff and legal counsel for the 31 <br />items on 107. Do I have a motion to adopt the findings of staff with regard to the findings set forth on page 32 <br />107 of attachment 4? 33 <br /> 34 <br />MOTION made by Barry Katz to adopt the findings of staff on page 107. Seconded by Susan Halkiotis. 35 <br />VOTE: Unanimous 36 <br /> 37 <br />Samantha Cabe: Moving on to page 108 and following pages, the standards specific for telecommunication 38 <br />facilities. This is the section where we get into some discrepancy between staff and legal counsel, and I 39 <br />believe the best way to do this is if there are no discrepancies on a page I will ask for a motion to adopt 40 <br />what is on the specific page and then if we have a page where there is a discrepancy we’ll discuss the 41 <br />conflicting finding, make a decision on that and then adopt the whole page. Is that satisfactory to the 42 <br />Board? 43 <br /> 44 <br />So, page 108 I have not noted any discrepancies with regard to those findings, staff recommendations are 45 <br />all yes with the supporting evidence listing there, mostly contained in their original permit that was 46 <br />submitted through supplemental information. Do I have a motion to adopt? 47 <br /> 48 <br />MOTION made by Barry Katz to adopt the findings of staff on page 108. Seconded by Susan Halkiotis. 49 <br />28