Browse
Search
BOA agenda 101016
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Agendas
>
2016
>
BOA agenda 101016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2018 4:14:58 PM
Creation date
3/6/2018 4:09:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/11/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
BOA minutes 101016
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Board of Adjustment\Minutes\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />James Bryan: Yes, this is, I think, just another example of just poor draftsmanship in the UDO. This is not a 2 <br />standard from which any Board can say yes or no. So, either N/A or yes because… 3 <br /> 4 <br />Michael Harvey: Next, the applicant shall demonstrate and provide a description in writing and by drawing 5 <br />how it shall effectively screen from view the base and all related equipment and structures; we’re going to 6 <br />refer you to the application attachment 2 and the site plan and vicinity map again with the same rationale I 7 <br />indicated above. They’re showing existing vegetation, as well as proposed vegetation to augment what’s 8 <br />already on site. The site plan shall indicate a location of at least 2 equipment buildings in addition to that 9 <br />proposed for use by the applicant; I’ll refer you to the original SUP application and the recorded SUP that 10 <br />provides this information. I’ll also tell you that the current site plan that’s submitted shows locations of 11 <br />structures on the property and there are a minimum of 2. Page 129, all utilities at a facility site shall be 12 <br />installed underground and in compliance with all laws, ordinances, rules and regulations of the County 13 <br />where appropriate; I have made a finding of N/A as the relocation of the drive will not impact existing 14 <br />utilities. 15 <br /> 16 <br />James Bryan: I don’t think they would have to comply, I don’t know if there are existing utilities. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Samantha Cabe: We had testimony that there was electricity being provided. Can we have Mr. Parker 19 <br />testify as to whether that was underground? 20 <br /> 21 <br />Paul Parker: That’s the plan, yes, ma’am. Underground utilities. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Samantha Cabe: Is it not already there? 24 <br /> 25 <br />Paul Parker: No, we have not… We have electricity on the site on a current access but, not where we’re 26 <br />applying for right now. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Samantha Cabe: So you’re going to dig up the electrical access and move it too? 29 <br /> 30 <br />Paul Parker: We’re going to abandon and put in new. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Barry Katz: I think what he’s saying is that in order for the gate to be electronically monitored there has to 33 <br />be electricity going to it. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Paul Parker: This is electricity to run the towers. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Barry Katz: So, you’re testimony is that all utilities will be underground where appropriate. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Paul Parker: Yes. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Michael Harvey: Applicant testimony indicates that they’ll comply with all utilities being underground where 42 <br />appropriate. 43 <br /> 44 <br />Jerry Bouche: The current subdivision is all underground. 45 <br /> 46 <br />Barry Katz: And is that a good excess power available for you to use that ok?.. I see, ok. 47 <br /> 48 <br />Michael Harvey: Ok, the next standard’s 5.10.8 B4J, all wireless support structures shall satisfy all 49 <br />23
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.