Orange County NC Website
17, 2013 letter, he said “to be sure Mr. Williams Klein and his adult children, Mr. Eric Klein, Ms. Heidi enjoy hunting 1 <br />and shooting”. Mr. Klein’s name is not on any of these sheriff’s reports, Ms. Heidi Klein, Mr. Eric Klein. We have 2 <br />Carlton Williams, Nathan Barnhart, and Christopher Wright twice. Christopher Wright is a resident of the mobile 3 <br />home park. We also have evidence although I can only test it with Mr. Klein testifying that Mr. McCloud Derek who 4 <br />we believe is also a non-relative and resident. We also have Stephen Johnson, Samuel Kelly, owner of the property 5 <br />Butch Klein so the sheriff’s department knows the people, I don’t know because I can’t question Mr. Klein but appear 6 <br />to be non-family members, residents of the mobile home park repeatedly using the property. We have two incidents, 7 <br />November 2, 2010, Christopher Wright who lives at 149 Ford Road, Lot 12 showed up in the report. Same Mr. 8 <br />Christopher Wright, June …. 9 <br /> 10 <br />David Blankfard: I understand there are people that are on the property but that is not against the law or against the 11 <br />rules. That is allowed. I can have people at my house. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Mark Micol: Do we have any of those members say they are members of a club? 14 <br /> 15 <br />T.C. Morphis: We can subpoena them and find out. At the end of the day, I am not arguing with you, this is certainly 16 <br />your purview. My point is that we are presenting evidence that there is a physical structure that is used repeatedly by 17 <br />people more than what Mr. Klein alleged. It points in a specific direction and the shells shoot straight at my client’s 18 <br />houses and but for their man-made berm and a little topography change, you could go from having thousands of 19 <br />rounds with no injury to shells entering people’s property and that at the end of the day is the evidence we are 20 <br />presenting. 21 <br /> 22 <br />Jeff Schmitt: The physical structure you are referring to is this berm that has been created? 23 <br /> 24 <br />T.C. Morphis: There is the berm, the use of the natural topographic drainage, there is a catwalk, there are targets, 25 <br />there are six or seven inch trees that have been cleared, there is a firing range, there is an entrance suitable for an 26 <br />ATV. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Larry Wright: So let’s just say that we declare all this, what can we do? We are just a Board of Adjustment. 29 <br /> 30 <br />T.C. Morphis: You are the only people in the county who can do anything about it. The Board of Commissioners can 31 <br />issue new regulations to regulate these uses but until they do and who knows when they will…. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Larry Wright: But we are independent of them. A member of the BOCC can sit right and we can rule against them 34 <br />and they have no recourse. 35 <br /> 36 <br />T.C. Morphis: That is exactly my point. Since staff has said they agree with Mr. Klein, staff has said there is no 37 <br />shooting range here. We are not telling you that you need to find the standards and say here is what the setbacks 38 <br />are but you need to determine and we actually have some arguments about what the legal definition of a shooting 39 <br />range is and at the appropriate time I will be happy to present that to the board but we believe this constitutes a 40 <br />shooting range. I can go into that or wait for my closing arguments. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Michael Harvey: I would like to respectively disagree with Mr. Morphis’ point. We have said there is no non-profit 43 <br />recreational facility as defined by the UDO. That is the only point in the UDO where the term shooting range is 44 <br />referenced. 45 <br /> 46 <br />T.C. Morphis: Could you say that again Mr. Harvey? 47 <br /> 48 <br />Michael Harvey: The only component the UDO references a shooting range is under a non-profit recreational facility 49 <br />or for profit recreation facility. 50 <br />41