Browse
Search
BOA agenda 111212
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Agendas
>
2012
>
BOA agenda 111212
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2018 3:23:05 PM
Creation date
3/6/2018 3:11:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/12/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br />55 <br />56 AGENDA ITEM 5: A -1 -12 —APPLICATION FOR CLASS B SUP FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A CLASS II <br />57 KENNEL <br />58 <br />59 Michael Harvey: As the typical rules of procedure of this board require where all individuals <br />60 intending to speak or provide any comments please come forward to be sworn in. <br />61 <br />62 Individuals sworn in: <br />Bob Hornik Mike Wheeler <br />Nora[ Stewart David Schmidt <br />Tammy Purner Robert Long <br />Kathleen Schenley Chad Abbott <br />Claudia Harris Cornelius Kirschner <br />Cecil Griffin <br />63 <br />64 Michael Harvey: At this time, I would ask the board to accept staff's abstract which begins on <br />65 page 3 of the packet into the record. This includes for purposes of the record, Attachment 1 <br />66 which is the actual Special Use Permit application including the site plan and other attachments. <br />67 Attachment 2, which is an aerial photograph of the property; and Attachment 3 which is staff <br />68 correspondence concerning this request. I will call to the board's attention which begins on <br />69 page 63 of the packet and that includes the septic permit issued by Orange County Health, <br />70 comments from the Sheriff's Department, Fire Marshal, Animal Control, the Department of <br />71 Environment and Natural Resources for Orange County and Attachment 4 which are the <br />72 Findings of Fact for this request. This is a script that will be reviewed by you prior to the closing <br />73 of the public hearing outlining the various standards to be held to. As you are aware, the <br />74 planning staff provides a recommendation on specific items as specified by the ordinance. An <br />75 example is, do we have a site plan, and was it submitted in accordance with the code as <br />76 containing required information. You will be reviewing our responses to that information. This <br />77 Board is obligated, once the public hearing is closed and deliberation begins, on page 97, you <br />78 are required to make specific findings of fact dealing with the project's compliance to Section <br />79 5.3.2(A)(2), the General Findings of Fact, that the use will maintain or promote the public health <br />80 safety and general welfare, that the use will maintain or enhance the value of contiguous <br />81 property, and the location and character of the use of development according to the plans <br />82 submitted will be in harmony with the area which is it to be located. In making motions to affirm <br />83 or negate, you will have to make specific findings of the information that has been entered in the <br />84 record allowing you to make this decision either for or against. I will also ask that you enter into <br />85 the record a statement from the applicant further identifying this project's compliance to the <br />86 Comprehensive Plan. You also have notes and a presentation from an adjacent property owner <br />87 who is asking you to take some things into consideration. You also have a copy of the public <br />88 notice we sent out to the adjacent property owners. I would like to submit the certified mail <br />89 receipts to be entered into the record that we complied with the provisions of notification for the <br />90 ordinance. We can now briefly review the application and turn it over to the applicant. <br />91 <br />92 Bob Hornik: I am an attorney with the Brough Law Firm in Chapel Hill. I am representing the <br />93 applicant here this evening in connection with the Special Use Permit application. Our team <br />94 includes David Schmidt; one of the people behind the application, and we have Tammy Purner, <br />95 and her husband, Andrew Purner, two of the applicants. We have Margie Schmitt, Dave's wife; <br />96 she is involved with the team. We have Cecil Griffin who is the property owner to the north of <br />97 the property and also an applicant. Chad Abbott from Southern Engineers, who will give you <br />98 the design details and site plan layout for the proposed kennel facility. Also, Michael Wheeler, a <br />99 certified real estate appraiser will talk about property value and Noral Stewart will provide a <br />100 noise impact that might be associated with the kennel operation. I am not going to go into any <br />101 detail right now regarding the application. Mr. Harvey did a good job of presenting the general <br />102 outline of the application. Kennel use is permitted in the Rural Buffer district with a special use <br />OC Board of Adjustment — 5/1412012 Page 2 of 41 <br />Q±A <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.