Browse
Search
BOH minutes 022400
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Board of Health
>
Minutes
>
2000
>
BOH minutes 022400
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2018 9:53:25 AM
Creation date
3/6/2018 9:53:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/24/2000
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH <br />February 24, 2000 <br /> <br />Board of Health Minutes <br />Transcription completed by Donna Cates 2 February 24, 2000 <br />and the County for animal shelter operations. Part of that review includes reviewing the <br />shelter procedures. The committee is not going to make any decisions regarding that <br />contract, rather they are going to make recommendations to this Board both for changes they <br />would like to see the A.P.S. make and changes they would recommend that this Board <br />consider in revising the contract. Then this Board would look at those and forward <br />recommendations to the Commissioners. Neither the Commissioners nor this Board or its <br />committee has the authority to require the A.P.S. to do anything. The Commissioners have <br />the authority to either renew the contract, not renew the contract, or ask that certain <br />provisions be included in the contract. <br /> <br />Understanding these limitations are important not only for the public, but for committee and <br />Board members to understand. It would be useful for the chair to clarify the scope of the <br />decision and the specific decisions needed at the beginning of the meeting. Page two <br />contains procedural issues that may be subject to change tonight. The sign-up sheets, <br />meeting summaries, and minutes are part of the recommended procedures to be followed. <br />The public does not have any input into the content of the minutes. Presenters who have <br />been invited to meetings can speak to clarify what they said, but it is the committees or <br />Board's responsibility to make sure minutes are correct. There are other requirements the <br />Department must follow regarding access to public documents, and sometimes the <br />distinctions between open meeting law and public access to documents is confusing. Neither <br />the Board nor the Department is required to provide copies of attachments to the agenda at <br />the meeting, nor are we required to send them to people ahead of time. We are required to <br />make them publicly available. The Department's current procedure for the Board of Health <br />meetings is to make a complete agenda packet available at the Orange County Public <br />Library, the Chapel Hill Public Library, the Clerk’s office to the Commissioners. If public <br />members want to look at a complete agenda packet they can access it in those locations. <br />We do bring extra copies to the meeting as a courtesy. The proposed room set-up is <br />intended to have committee members be able to see each other as well as to have some <br />clarity of who is a committee member and who is a member of the public or an invited <br />presenter. <br /> <br />Barry Jacobs commented that he thought the guidelines were very important, because while <br />most meetings tend to be very civil, at other times we may have issues that inspire people to <br />be more aggressive. It’s good to have a standard way of dealing with things up front. He <br />used as an illustration the Planning Board Ordinance Review Committee, made up of three <br />people that reviews mobile home park standards. When the three committee members <br />started the meeting, there were so many people from the public in attendance that they had <br />to move into the big room at the courthouse. It’s times like this that it’s good to have a <br />structure you can rely on. <br /> <br />Rick Marinshaw suggested that the number of minutes allowed for public comment is 3-5 <br />minutes per person. While it's good to have it specified up front, if there is just one person <br />you have more flexibility and could allow them more time for comments, but if you have 30 or <br />40 people, it really is important to keep it moving and short. That should be left to the <br />discretion of whoever is running the meeting. For committee meetings, it would be good to <br />state in the beginning that it’s not a public hearing. If it is a committee meeting, we should <br />make it known that the committee will not be making any final decisions, we’re just trying to <br />gather information to present to the board. The full board will vote on it to make any final <br />decisions. We should make known what the committee has the authority to do. I think that <br />it’s good to state up front the expectations of the meeting before you say who is going to <br />make presentations. That leads into what the meeting is about and what you expect to do. <br />Then it leads into who is giving presentations or giving reports. It would also be useful to <br />mention to the public that written comments could be submitted to the Health Director or the <br />Board.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.